These remarks were prepared for and delivered at the Second Annual Fordham University School of Law Dispute Resolution Society Symposium on October 12, 2007. The Address discusses how democracy, public dispute resolution, and social justice fit together. The speaker opens with an example of a small city making a decision about a large industrial development project from the perspective of a traditional model and a consensus-oriented model. He then addresses three major problems with the first: (i) the majority rule problem; (ii) the representation problem; and (iii) the adversarial format problem. The speaker goes on to advocate for the consensus-building model, followed by a Question and Answer session
Public participation has become an integral part of environmental policymaking. Dispute resolution-w...
British social philosopher Stuart Hampshire recently articulated the fundamental and foundational pr...
Keynote Address at Inaugual Fordham Dispute Resolution Society Symposium: ADR as a Tool for Achievi...
Since Roscoe Pound’s famous 1906 speech to the American Bar Association on popular dissatisfaction w...
Without doubt, popular rhetoric puts forth the image of an American system of dispute resolution in ...
The development of systems of multi-stakeholder dispute resolution is increasingly recognized as an ...
The focus of the panel discussion is problem-solving mechanisms in the public arena to ensure and ac...
This issue collects a part of the papers presented at the conference titled “Building Consensus. Rhe...
Systems of multi-stakeholder dispute resolution are increasingly recognized as objectives of good go...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
processes to foster agreement on public policy is growing rapidly in the United States. In my home s...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
We in dispute resolution can view civil discourse about public issues - a direct, deliberative way o...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This analysis compares a consensus-oriented procedure, Princeton Future, with a more adversarial pro...
Public participation has become an integral part of environmental policymaking. Dispute resolution-w...
British social philosopher Stuart Hampshire recently articulated the fundamental and foundational pr...
Keynote Address at Inaugual Fordham Dispute Resolution Society Symposium: ADR as a Tool for Achievi...
Since Roscoe Pound’s famous 1906 speech to the American Bar Association on popular dissatisfaction w...
Without doubt, popular rhetoric puts forth the image of an American system of dispute resolution in ...
The development of systems of multi-stakeholder dispute resolution is increasingly recognized as an ...
The focus of the panel discussion is problem-solving mechanisms in the public arena to ensure and ac...
This issue collects a part of the papers presented at the conference titled “Building Consensus. Rhe...
Systems of multi-stakeholder dispute resolution are increasingly recognized as objectives of good go...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
processes to foster agreement on public policy is growing rapidly in the United States. In my home s...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
We in dispute resolution can view civil discourse about public issues - a direct, deliberative way o...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This analysis compares a consensus-oriented procedure, Princeton Future, with a more adversarial pro...
Public participation has become an integral part of environmental policymaking. Dispute resolution-w...
British social philosopher Stuart Hampshire recently articulated the fundamental and foundational pr...
Keynote Address at Inaugual Fordham Dispute Resolution Society Symposium: ADR as a Tool for Achievi...