As e-mail and other forms of electronic communications began becoming widely used, Congress recognized the need to protect these new forms of communication from impermissible intrusion. Unsure whether the flexible approach to determining the extent of Fourth Amendment protections as announced in Katz v. United States would extend to electronic communications, Congress enacted the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) to ensure a baseline level of protection. This Note argues that the Fourth Amendment does extend to electronic communications and, therefore, the provisions of the ECPA that allow the government to access certain electronic communications without a search warrant are unconstitutional
This Note examines the application of Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrines to the intercept...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
In 1986, Congress passed the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) to provide additional protections for...
The question of whether and how the Fourth Amendment regulates government access to stored e-mail re...
The question of whether and how the Fourth Amendment regulates government access to stored e-mail re...
This paper contains the law professors\u27 brief in the landmark case of Warshak v. United States, t...
This paper contains the law professors\u27 brief in the landmark case of Warshak v. United States, t...
Under current doctrines, parties to a communication enjoy robust constitutional protection against g...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note examines the Fourth Amendment particularity requirement, explains how ...
This article takes the position that the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (...
In 1986, Congress enacted the Electronic Communications Privacy Act ( ECPA ) to update and clarify f...
The paper examines the distinction between stored communications and the greater privacy protectio...
ECPA has functioned fairly well during its first 20 years in striking the right balance between law ...
When Congress foresaw the need for privacy protection for personal and commercial communications, it...
Section 14 of the Constitution provides for the right to privacy, which includes the right not to ha...
This Note examines the application of Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrines to the intercept...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
In 1986, Congress passed the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) to provide additional protections for...
The question of whether and how the Fourth Amendment regulates government access to stored e-mail re...
The question of whether and how the Fourth Amendment regulates government access to stored e-mail re...
This paper contains the law professors\u27 brief in the landmark case of Warshak v. United States, t...
This paper contains the law professors\u27 brief in the landmark case of Warshak v. United States, t...
Under current doctrines, parties to a communication enjoy robust constitutional protection against g...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note examines the Fourth Amendment particularity requirement, explains how ...
This article takes the position that the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (...
In 1986, Congress enacted the Electronic Communications Privacy Act ( ECPA ) to update and clarify f...
The paper examines the distinction between stored communications and the greater privacy protectio...
ECPA has functioned fairly well during its first 20 years in striking the right balance between law ...
When Congress foresaw the need for privacy protection for personal and commercial communications, it...
Section 14 of the Constitution provides for the right to privacy, which includes the right not to ha...
This Note examines the application of Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrines to the intercept...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
In 1986, Congress passed the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) to provide additional protections for...