In its oversight of union representation elections, the National Labor Relations Board seeks to create “laboratory conditions” to determine “the uninhibited desires” of employees. Despite the Board’s intrusive regulation of union and employer campaign conduct, the Board does nothing to insure that employees get basic information relating to their decision. Given the flaws in the market for union representation, particularly with respect to conflicts of interest, the Board should take a more aggressive role in ensuring that employees get the information they need to make rational representation decisions. This Article proposes a new system of mandatory disclosure, modeled on disclosure regimes such as in federal securities regulation, in ...
Access to information promotes values of transparency, openness, and accountability that are importa...
This Note examines the application of FOIA and the Privacy Act to union requests for employee names ...
In this article, Professor Schwab compares the union member-leader relationship to the corporate sha...
For over sixty years, the National Labor Relations Board has followed the “laboratory conditions” do...
In its oversight of union representation elections, the National Labor Relations Board seeks to crea...
Labor unions in the United States are subject to financial reporting mandates, requiring them to dis...
In response to Matthew T. Bodie’s article, “Information and the Market for Union Representation,” 94...
The National Labor Relations Act\u27s ( NLRA ) central purpose is to reduce industrial strife and st...
In Union Representation Elections. Law and Reality (hereinafterLaw and Reality without cross-referen...
This paper uses data newly-available from labor union LM-2 forms available on the Department of Labo...
The National Labor Relations Act gives American workers the right to workplace representation, yet m...
In Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality [hereinafter cited as Law and Reality], we examin...
In order for a union to represent a group of workers, a petition to start the election process must ...
Any procedure requiring a “fair” election must honor the rights of both those who oppose and those w...
This article proposes a new theoretical framework-the strategic dynamic certification model-to expla...
Access to information promotes values of transparency, openness, and accountability that are importa...
This Note examines the application of FOIA and the Privacy Act to union requests for employee names ...
In this article, Professor Schwab compares the union member-leader relationship to the corporate sha...
For over sixty years, the National Labor Relations Board has followed the “laboratory conditions” do...
In its oversight of union representation elections, the National Labor Relations Board seeks to crea...
Labor unions in the United States are subject to financial reporting mandates, requiring them to dis...
In response to Matthew T. Bodie’s article, “Information and the Market for Union Representation,” 94...
The National Labor Relations Act\u27s ( NLRA ) central purpose is to reduce industrial strife and st...
In Union Representation Elections. Law and Reality (hereinafterLaw and Reality without cross-referen...
This paper uses data newly-available from labor union LM-2 forms available on the Department of Labo...
The National Labor Relations Act gives American workers the right to workplace representation, yet m...
In Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality [hereinafter cited as Law and Reality], we examin...
In order for a union to represent a group of workers, a petition to start the election process must ...
Any procedure requiring a “fair” election must honor the rights of both those who oppose and those w...
This article proposes a new theoretical framework-the strategic dynamic certification model-to expla...
Access to information promotes values of transparency, openness, and accountability that are importa...
This Note examines the application of FOIA and the Privacy Act to union requests for employee names ...
In this article, Professor Schwab compares the union member-leader relationship to the corporate sha...