Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court will decide as a matter of law whether an American citizen detained as an enemy combatant has the right to counsel. The author argues that as a matter of ethics, the answer is clear - there is a right to counsel. In this Article, the author analyzes the cases regarding Jose Padilla and Yaser Esam Hamdi discusses ABA Model Rule 4.2, and its application, and proposes an amendment to Rule 4.2\u27s Comment
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) enables a commanding officer to sentence a...
Today, an immigrant green card holder mandatorily detained pending his removal proceedings, without ...
Military lawyers at Guantanamo Bay are part of and witness to a legal system decried as the gulag of...
The Supreme Court will decide as a matter of law whether an American citizen detained as an enemy co...
This Note examines Padilla v. Bush as an example of the contemporary application of enemy combatant ...
Imprisoned person's communication and consultation with his legal counsel has been ambiguous for...
This comment examines the unequal treatment of United States citizens who are labeled enemy combatan...
The United States administration’s policy of detaining ‘unlawful enemy combatants’ at the United Sta...
The United States administration’s policy of detaining ‘unlawful enemy combatants’ at the United Sta...
The control of the Executive in emergency, that is of their actions and measures undertaken in such ...
Indigent noncitizen defendants with misdemeanor charges face nearly insurmountable challenges as the...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
In Military Justice and the Right to Counsel, S. Sidney Ulmer seeks to explore and compare the right...
The ABA Criminal Justice Standards have been recognized by the Supreme Court as one of the most impo...
This Comment discusses the independent approach to the problem of defining and limiting waiver of co...
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) enables a commanding officer to sentence a...
Today, an immigrant green card holder mandatorily detained pending his removal proceedings, without ...
Military lawyers at Guantanamo Bay are part of and witness to a legal system decried as the gulag of...
The Supreme Court will decide as a matter of law whether an American citizen detained as an enemy co...
This Note examines Padilla v. Bush as an example of the contemporary application of enemy combatant ...
Imprisoned person's communication and consultation with his legal counsel has been ambiguous for...
This comment examines the unequal treatment of United States citizens who are labeled enemy combatan...
The United States administration’s policy of detaining ‘unlawful enemy combatants’ at the United Sta...
The United States administration’s policy of detaining ‘unlawful enemy combatants’ at the United Sta...
The control of the Executive in emergency, that is of their actions and measures undertaken in such ...
Indigent noncitizen defendants with misdemeanor charges face nearly insurmountable challenges as the...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
In Military Justice and the Right to Counsel, S. Sidney Ulmer seeks to explore and compare the right...
The ABA Criminal Justice Standards have been recognized by the Supreme Court as one of the most impo...
This Comment discusses the independent approach to the problem of defining and limiting waiver of co...
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) enables a commanding officer to sentence a...
Today, an immigrant green card holder mandatorily detained pending his removal proceedings, without ...
Military lawyers at Guantanamo Bay are part of and witness to a legal system decried as the gulag of...