Add to ORKGThis paper explains why the use of prosecution history estoppel to limit the doctrine of equivalents only when an estoppel exists is unsound. The standards for overcoming an estoppel should be used in every case and not just where there is an estoppel
Abstract: The present paper address the history, modern state, and empirical evidence for ...
The Congress shall have the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing fo...
In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, the United States Supreme Court ap- -proved the offensive, unilate...
This paper explains why the use of prosecution history estoppel to limit the doctrine of equivalents...
The doctrine of 'prosecution history estoppel' (PH estoppel) as developed in the United States has s...
Under the rule of prosecution history estoppel, patent applicants who amend their claims during the ...
Through empirical research, this article examines whether the patent system of the United States sho...
On November 29, 2000, the Federal Circuit retroactively reduced the value of nearly 1.2 million unex...
The Supreme Court again began to delve into substantial patent issues by addressing the interplay be...
Marking is the act of placing a patent number on a product or its packaging. The doctrine of marking...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the doctrine of equivalents is not inconsistent wit...
In their book Patent Failure , Jim Bessen and Michael Meurer show that patents outside the fields o...
In the Festo decision, the Federal Circuit significantly changed the scope of the doctrine of equiva...
In almost every context, the Federal Circuit has used estoppel doctrines to provide protection to pa...
From its beginning, American patent law has extended patent protection beyond the explicitly disclos...
Abstract: The present paper address the history, modern state, and empirical evidence for ...
The Congress shall have the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing fo...
In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, the United States Supreme Court ap- -proved the offensive, unilate...
This paper explains why the use of prosecution history estoppel to limit the doctrine of equivalents...
The doctrine of 'prosecution history estoppel' (PH estoppel) as developed in the United States has s...
Under the rule of prosecution history estoppel, patent applicants who amend their claims during the ...
Through empirical research, this article examines whether the patent system of the United States sho...
On November 29, 2000, the Federal Circuit retroactively reduced the value of nearly 1.2 million unex...
The Supreme Court again began to delve into substantial patent issues by addressing the interplay be...
Marking is the act of placing a patent number on a product or its packaging. The doctrine of marking...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the doctrine of equivalents is not inconsistent wit...
In their book Patent Failure , Jim Bessen and Michael Meurer show that patents outside the fields o...
In the Festo decision, the Federal Circuit significantly changed the scope of the doctrine of equiva...
In almost every context, the Federal Circuit has used estoppel doctrines to provide protection to pa...
From its beginning, American patent law has extended patent protection beyond the explicitly disclos...
Abstract: The present paper address the history, modern state, and empirical evidence for ...
The Congress shall have the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing fo...
In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, the United States Supreme Court ap- -proved the offensive, unilate...