Add to ORKGAbstract: The present paper address the history, modern state, and empirical evidence for the evolution of the doctrine of equivalents in United States Patent Law. In addition, the paper presents an overview of the main critical nuances of the modern doctrine of equivalents raised by scholars. Finally, the author concludes the close interconnection of the doctrine of equivalents with the claim construction doctrine based on their shared history and empirical analysis of the case outcomes
The doctrine of equivalents (DOE) allows courts to expand the scope of patent rights granted by the ...
For a number of years, U.S. courts have noted that the doctrine of equivalents has been unworkable. ...
Proponents of legislative patent reform argue that the current patent system perversely impedes true...
The doctrine of equivalents is arguably one of the most important aspects ofpatent law. The protecti...
From its beginning, American patent law has extended patent protection beyond the explicitly disclos...
The doctrine of equivalents is arguably one of the most important aspects of patent law. The protect...
This article provides a novel theoretical model and extensive empirical evidence to explain the decl...
Under the holding of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton-Davis Chemical Co., a court will not limit an in...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is justifiably credited with the restoration of the pre...
410-421Due to the emergence of fast moving technology, there are more disputes than ever, requiring ...
When a device performs substantially the same function, in substantially the same way, to obtain sub...
(Excerpt) Over the past century, few patent issues have been considered so often by the Supreme Cour...
314-329The scope of a patent is not limited to its literal terms, but instead embraces all equivalen...
Through empirical research, this article examines whether the patent system of the United States sho...
The doctrine of equivalents (DOE) allows courts to expand the scope of patent rights granted by the ...
The doctrine of equivalents (DOE) allows courts to expand the scope of patent rights granted by the ...
For a number of years, U.S. courts have noted that the doctrine of equivalents has been unworkable. ...
Proponents of legislative patent reform argue that the current patent system perversely impedes true...
The doctrine of equivalents is arguably one of the most important aspects ofpatent law. The protecti...
From its beginning, American patent law has extended patent protection beyond the explicitly disclos...
The doctrine of equivalents is arguably one of the most important aspects of patent law. The protect...
This article provides a novel theoretical model and extensive empirical evidence to explain the decl...
Under the holding of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton-Davis Chemical Co., a court will not limit an in...
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is justifiably credited with the restoration of the pre...
410-421Due to the emergence of fast moving technology, there are more disputes than ever, requiring ...
When a device performs substantially the same function, in substantially the same way, to obtain sub...
(Excerpt) Over the past century, few patent issues have been considered so often by the Supreme Cour...
314-329The scope of a patent is not limited to its literal terms, but instead embraces all equivalen...
Through empirical research, this article examines whether the patent system of the United States sho...
The doctrine of equivalents (DOE) allows courts to expand the scope of patent rights granted by the ...
The doctrine of equivalents (DOE) allows courts to expand the scope of patent rights granted by the ...
For a number of years, U.S. courts have noted that the doctrine of equivalents has been unworkable. ...
Proponents of legislative patent reform argue that the current patent system perversely impedes true...