Add to ORKGWhat is the effect of a deadlocked jury in a sentencing hearing for the application of the death penalty on the termination of jeopardy? This comment will explore this issue as presented in Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, and analyze not only the arguments made in both the majority and dissenting opinions, but other considerations which arise when deciding if double jeopardy protections should apply. Also considered in the comment is the effect of the Sattazahn decision on future criminal defendants. What consequences will this decision have for the death row defendant when trying to decide whether to appeal his possibly erroneous conviction
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applic...
Double jeopardy jurisprudence evolved in the common law in response to the inherent deficiencies in ...
Professor Western wrote Death and Double Jeopardy for a January, 1981, issue of Res Gestae, the Mi...
What is the effect of a deadlocked jury in a sentencing hearing for the application of the death pen...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution...
On May 10, 2011, in Harrison v. Gillespie, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
The United States Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment did not ...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision allowing a trial judge in the sentencing...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
Fifteen Years and Death is a Note that considers a completely novel application of the Double Jeopar...
Courts and commentators treat as axiomatic that the Double Jeopardy Clause protects against multiple...
In Bullington v. Missouri the Supreme Court marked a significant departure from previous principles ...
In addition to protecting a criminal defendant against multiple trials, the double jeopardy clause p...
This Article addresses whether the U.S. Constitution requires courts to permit capital defendants to...
This Comment will argue that an as applied approach allows the executive branch, whether at the stat...
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applic...
Double jeopardy jurisprudence evolved in the common law in response to the inherent deficiencies in ...
Professor Western wrote Death and Double Jeopardy for a January, 1981, issue of Res Gestae, the Mi...
What is the effect of a deadlocked jury in a sentencing hearing for the application of the death pen...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution...
On May 10, 2011, in Harrison v. Gillespie, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
The United States Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment did not ...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision allowing a trial judge in the sentencing...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
Fifteen Years and Death is a Note that considers a completely novel application of the Double Jeopar...
Courts and commentators treat as axiomatic that the Double Jeopardy Clause protects against multiple...
In Bullington v. Missouri the Supreme Court marked a significant departure from previous principles ...
In addition to protecting a criminal defendant against multiple trials, the double jeopardy clause p...
This Article addresses whether the U.S. Constitution requires courts to permit capital defendants to...
This Comment will argue that an as applied approach allows the executive branch, whether at the stat...
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applic...
Double jeopardy jurisprudence evolved in the common law in response to the inherent deficiencies in ...
Professor Western wrote Death and Double Jeopardy for a January, 1981, issue of Res Gestae, the Mi...