Add to ORKGProfessor Western wrote Death and Double Jeopardy for a January, 1981, issue of Res Gestae, the Michigan Law School student newspaper. The subject of the article, Bullington v. Missouri, was argued to the U.S. Supreme on Jan 14, 1981. The Supreme Court has since decided Bullington, holding on May 4, 1981, that the defendant could not be sentenced to death following his earlier sentence of life imprisonment
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
As the Supreme Court has said, time and again, death is different: It is different in kind from any...
This Note argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial after reversals of convictions tainted...
Professor Western wrote Death and Double Jeopardy for a January, 1981, issue of Res Gestae, the Mi...
In Bullington v. Missouri the Supreme Court marked a significant departure from previous principles ...
On May 10, 2011, in Harrison v. Gillespie, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
What is the effect of a deadlocked jury in a sentencing hearing for the application of the death pen...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution...
The United States Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment did not ...
In the forty-four years since the Court employed the Eighth Amendment to temporarily suspend the dea...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision allowing a trial judge in the sentencing...
Kansas law provides that unless a capital sentencing jury concludes that the mitigating factors that...
This Recent Development first traces the evolution of the double jeopardy doctrine. The Recent Devel...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
[Excerpt] “This article will survey Massachusetts homicide cases from 1805 to 1996 in which the SJC ...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
As the Supreme Court has said, time and again, death is different: It is different in kind from any...
This Note argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial after reversals of convictions tainted...
Professor Western wrote Death and Double Jeopardy for a January, 1981, issue of Res Gestae, the Mi...
In Bullington v. Missouri the Supreme Court marked a significant departure from previous principles ...
On May 10, 2011, in Harrison v. Gillespie, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
What is the effect of a deadlocked jury in a sentencing hearing for the application of the death pen...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution...
The United States Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment did not ...
In the forty-four years since the Court employed the Eighth Amendment to temporarily suspend the dea...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision allowing a trial judge in the sentencing...
Kansas law provides that unless a capital sentencing jury concludes that the mitigating factors that...
This Recent Development first traces the evolution of the double jeopardy doctrine. The Recent Devel...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
[Excerpt] “This article will survey Massachusetts homicide cases from 1805 to 1996 in which the SJC ...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
As the Supreme Court has said, time and again, death is different: It is different in kind from any...
This Note argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial after reversals of convictions tainted...