Add to ORKGBy failing to recognize the challenges facing political and military leaders in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, in reversing fifty-four years of precedent relied upon by the executive branch, and in failing to consider the political question doctrine, the Supreme Court in Rasul charted a dangerous constitutional course that could lead to greater judicial involvement in war-making powers and greater levels of conflict among the three branches. These trends will ultimately threaten the nation\u27s ability to fight and win future wars. The decision is ill-advised, ill-timed, and invites unintended consequences
After the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, the balance of power be...
The doctrines requiring judicial deference to executive interpretations of laws affecting foreign af...
As virtually every law student who studies Marbury v. Madison learns, Chief Justice John Marshall\u2...
By failing to recognize the challenges facing political and military leaders in the wake of the Sept...
The War Powers Resolution was enacted to serve as a congressional restraint on the President’s power...
When the Executive\u27s use of the war powers infringes on individual liberties and resulting cases ...
This article discusses the Supreme Court's controversial Rasul v. Bush decision--a case dealing with...
From the Vietnam War to the present, there has been a growing impression that federal courts lack bo...
On June 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court released its much awaited decisions in the cases p...
On July 28, 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States decided three cases at the center of the co...
Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforc...
For the past half century, Presidents have claimed constitutional authority to take the country from...
More than seventeen years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States continues to ba...
Thanksgiving 1990 found our nation on the brink of a constitutional crisis. The President threatened...
As the dust of the Bush administration’s war on terror settles, casualties are starting to appear on...
After the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, the balance of power be...
The doctrines requiring judicial deference to executive interpretations of laws affecting foreign af...
As virtually every law student who studies Marbury v. Madison learns, Chief Justice John Marshall\u2...
By failing to recognize the challenges facing political and military leaders in the wake of the Sept...
The War Powers Resolution was enacted to serve as a congressional restraint on the President’s power...
When the Executive\u27s use of the war powers infringes on individual liberties and resulting cases ...
This article discusses the Supreme Court's controversial Rasul v. Bush decision--a case dealing with...
From the Vietnam War to the present, there has been a growing impression that federal courts lack bo...
On June 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court released its much awaited decisions in the cases p...
On July 28, 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States decided three cases at the center of the co...
Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforc...
For the past half century, Presidents have claimed constitutional authority to take the country from...
More than seventeen years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States continues to ba...
Thanksgiving 1990 found our nation on the brink of a constitutional crisis. The President threatened...
As the dust of the Bush administration’s war on terror settles, casualties are starting to appear on...
After the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, the balance of power be...
The doctrines requiring judicial deference to executive interpretations of laws affecting foreign af...
As virtually every law student who studies Marbury v. Madison learns, Chief Justice John Marshall\u2...