Add to ORKGBy failing to recognize the challenges facing political and military leaders in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, in reversing fifty-four years of precedent relied upon by the executive branch, and in failing to consider the political question doctrine, the Supreme Court in Rasul charted a dangerous constitutional course that could lead to greater judicial involvement in war-making powers and greater levels of conflict among the three branches. These trends will ultimately threaten the nation\u27s ability to fight and win future wars. The decision is ill-advised, ill-timed, and invites unintended consequences
Symposium: War, Terrorism and Torture: Limits on Presidential Power in the 21st Century. Convened by...
As the dust of the Bush administration’s war on terror settles, casualties are starting to appear on...
From the Vietnam War to the present, there has been a growing impression that federal courts lack bo...
By failing to recognize the challenges facing political and military leaders in the wake of the Sept...
On July 28, 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States decided three cases at the center of the co...
This article discusses the Supreme Court's controversial Rasul v. Bush decision--a case dealing with...
On June 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court released its much awaited decisions in the cases p...
This article examines the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, and contrasts the diff...
When the Executive\u27s use of the war powers infringes on individual liberties and resulting cases ...
More than seventeen years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States continues to ba...
This Article examines the United States\u27 response to the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda f...
In 1952, President Harry S. Truman promulgated an Executive Order that authorized federal government...
Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforc...
The Bush and Obama administrations have pursued a military campaign during the War on Terror in whic...
For the past half century, Presidents have claimed constitutional authority to take the country from...
Symposium: War, Terrorism and Torture: Limits on Presidential Power in the 21st Century. Convened by...
As the dust of the Bush administration’s war on terror settles, casualties are starting to appear on...
From the Vietnam War to the present, there has been a growing impression that federal courts lack bo...
By failing to recognize the challenges facing political and military leaders in the wake of the Sept...
On July 28, 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States decided three cases at the center of the co...
This article discusses the Supreme Court's controversial Rasul v. Bush decision--a case dealing with...
On June 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court released its much awaited decisions in the cases p...
This article examines the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, and contrasts the diff...
When the Executive\u27s use of the war powers infringes on individual liberties and resulting cases ...
More than seventeen years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States continues to ba...
This Article examines the United States\u27 response to the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda f...
In 1952, President Harry S. Truman promulgated an Executive Order that authorized federal government...
Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforc...
The Bush and Obama administrations have pursued a military campaign during the War on Terror in whic...
For the past half century, Presidents have claimed constitutional authority to take the country from...
Symposium: War, Terrorism and Torture: Limits on Presidential Power in the 21st Century. Convened by...
As the dust of the Bush administration’s war on terror settles, casualties are starting to appear on...
From the Vietnam War to the present, there has been a growing impression that federal courts lack bo...