Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the states, the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana has determined that, even assuming such an imposition, successive municipal and state prosecutions remain constitutionally permissible. Based, however, upon an erroneous analogy to the justifications underlying successive state and federal prosecutions, the court\u27s conclusion seems uncompelling. Moreover, the court failed to consider the significant question of whether such state and municipal prosecutions are consistent with the requirements of due process
It is, therefore, important in any analysis of the Ashe decision to examine the policies and purpose...
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and ...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
The Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause is an analytically gnarly beast. What seems like a fairly ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that where the interests of the Commonwealth have been suffi...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
The Virginia Constitution provides: That in criminal prosecutions a man . . . shall not . . . be pu...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for ...
Developing as a result of a period when an accused person was placed at a tremendous disadvantage at...
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution protects criminal defendants against be...
It is, therefore, important in any analysis of the Ashe decision to examine the policies and purpose...
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and ...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
The Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause is an analytically gnarly beast. What seems like a fairly ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that where the interests of the Commonwealth have been suffi...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
The Virginia Constitution provides: That in criminal prosecutions a man . . . shall not . . . be pu...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for ...
Developing as a result of a period when an accused person was placed at a tremendous disadvantage at...
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution protects criminal defendants against be...
It is, therefore, important in any analysis of the Ashe decision to examine the policies and purpose...
Under the judicially created dual-sovereignty exception, a defendant may be prosecuted by state and ...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...