Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the states, the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana has determined that, even assuming such an imposition, successive municipal and state prosecutions remain constitutionally permissible. Based, however, upon an erroneous analogy to the justifications underlying successive state and federal prosecutions, the court\u27s conclusion seems uncompelling. Moreover, the court failed to consider the significant question of whether such state and municipal prosecutions are consistent with the requirements of due process
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution protects criminal defendants against be...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
This comment\u27s concern is the situation in which a municipality and a state each define the same ...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
The Virginia Constitution provides: That in criminal prosecutions a man . . . shall not . . . be pu...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that where the interests of the Commonwealth have been suffi...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
Defendant had been acquitted of a criminal charge of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat an incom...
This article analyzes the U. S. constitutional law interpreting the concept of “same offence.” Inclu...
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution protects criminal defendants against be...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
This comment\u27s concern is the situation in which a municipality and a state each define the same ...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
In Benton v. Maryland, decided in June of this year, the Supreme Court explicitly extended fifth ame...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
The Virginia Constitution provides: That in criminal prosecutions a man . . . shall not . . . be pu...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that where the interests of the Commonwealth have been suffi...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
Defendant had been acquitted of a criminal charge of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat an incom...
This article analyzes the U. S. constitutional law interpreting the concept of “same offence.” Inclu...
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution protects criminal defendants against be...
How should the legal community think about double jeopardy in the wake of the Rodney King affair? Th...
This comment\u27s concern is the situation in which a municipality and a state each define the same ...