This paper employs two variants of the “mind game” to show how a subtle variation in the game\u27s rules affects cheating. In both variants of the game, cheating is invisible because subjects make their choices purely in their minds. The only difference stems from the ordering of steps that subjects are instructed to follow when playing the game. The order of play has a significant impact on cheating behavior, even though the rules cannot be enforced
We study the role of whistle-blowing in the following inspection game. Two agents who compete for a ...
Across four experiments, we show that when people can serve their self-interest, they are more likel...
Reading the newspapers and listening to the media news channels for the last decade, one makes the o...
This paper employs two variants of the “mind game” to show how a subtle variation in the game\u27s r...
This paper employs two variants of the “mind game ” to show how a subtle variation in the game’s rul...
We present evidence from a laboratory experiment showing that individuals who believe they were trea...
We study equilibrium reporting behavior in cheating games when agents have a fixed cost of lying and...
In this paper, we study the correlation between cheating in the lab and cheating in the field. We co...
In this paper we present a new design which allows us to draw inferences on the distribution of lyin...
Research by social psychologists and others consistently finds that people are poor at detecting att...
Abstract: We present evidence from a laboratory experiment showing that individuals who believe they...
In this paper, I explore the concept of cheating in the medium of the video game. Why do people do i...
When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify thei...
A series of 50 responses regarding reasons for cheating behavior in video games were provided by und...
We study a dynamic variant of the die-under-the-cup task where players can repeatedly misreport the ...
We study the role of whistle-blowing in the following inspection game. Two agents who compete for a ...
Across four experiments, we show that when people can serve their self-interest, they are more likel...
Reading the newspapers and listening to the media news channels for the last decade, one makes the o...
This paper employs two variants of the “mind game” to show how a subtle variation in the game\u27s r...
This paper employs two variants of the “mind game ” to show how a subtle variation in the game’s rul...
We present evidence from a laboratory experiment showing that individuals who believe they were trea...
We study equilibrium reporting behavior in cheating games when agents have a fixed cost of lying and...
In this paper, we study the correlation between cheating in the lab and cheating in the field. We co...
In this paper we present a new design which allows us to draw inferences on the distribution of lyin...
Research by social psychologists and others consistently finds that people are poor at detecting att...
Abstract: We present evidence from a laboratory experiment showing that individuals who believe they...
In this paper, I explore the concept of cheating in the medium of the video game. Why do people do i...
When people can profit financially by lying, they do so to the extent to which they can justify thei...
A series of 50 responses regarding reasons for cheating behavior in video games were provided by und...
We study a dynamic variant of the die-under-the-cup task where players can repeatedly misreport the ...
We study the role of whistle-blowing in the following inspection game. Two agents who compete for a ...
Across four experiments, we show that when people can serve their self-interest, they are more likel...
Reading the newspapers and listening to the media news channels for the last decade, one makes the o...