Although behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) have both intuitive and empirical appeal, they have not always yielded superior results in contrast with graphic rating scales. The present study examined the issue of how behavioral descriptions are anchored. Subjects scaled anchors describing teaching performance in a college classroom using either a graphic rating procedure or a pair-comparison procedure. The two different methods resulted in scale anchors with different properties, particularly with respect to item dispersions. It was proposed that the choice of an anchoring procedure depends on the nature of the actual rating process
A memory-based scaling model--ANCHOR--is proposed and tested. The perceived magnitude of the target ...
scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respondents must use the ordered response categories ...
The purpose of this study was to develop a behaviorally anchored rating scale for obtaining student ...
Although behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) have both intuitive and empirical appeal, they h...
Compared ratings derived from behavioral expectation scales developed by 147 personnel management st...
Empirical findings on Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) have been mixed, despite early rese...
This research project assesses whether the number of behavioral anchors increases rater accuracy in ...
Likert scales traditionally used in student evaluations of teaching (SET) suffer from several shortc...
dure was compared with a carefully constructed summated rating scale. Using both scales, 727 undergr...
The purpose of this study was to determine if leniency and halo error in student ratings could be re...
This study investigated the applicability of Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales to the evaluation o...
This research study seeks to determine if defining more anchors on behaviorally anchored rating scal...
Rating scales to assess the level of proficiency of human performance have come in a wide variety of...
The fundamental requirement of using Likert scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respond...
In this chapter, we discuss validity issues commonly related to rating scales, describe several freq...
A memory-based scaling model--ANCHOR--is proposed and tested. The perceived magnitude of the target ...
scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respondents must use the ordered response categories ...
The purpose of this study was to develop a behaviorally anchored rating scale for obtaining student ...
Although behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) have both intuitive and empirical appeal, they h...
Compared ratings derived from behavioral expectation scales developed by 147 personnel management st...
Empirical findings on Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) have been mixed, despite early rese...
This research project assesses whether the number of behavioral anchors increases rater accuracy in ...
Likert scales traditionally used in student evaluations of teaching (SET) suffer from several shortc...
dure was compared with a carefully constructed summated rating scale. Using both scales, 727 undergr...
The purpose of this study was to determine if leniency and halo error in student ratings could be re...
This study investigated the applicability of Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales to the evaluation o...
This research study seeks to determine if defining more anchors on behaviorally anchored rating scal...
Rating scales to assess the level of proficiency of human performance have come in a wide variety of...
The fundamental requirement of using Likert scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respond...
In this chapter, we discuss validity issues commonly related to rating scales, describe several freq...
A memory-based scaling model--ANCHOR--is proposed and tested. The perceived magnitude of the target ...
scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respondents must use the ordered response categories ...
The purpose of this study was to develop a behaviorally anchored rating scale for obtaining student ...