The Supreme Court\u27s current doctrinal rules governing racial discrimination and affirmative action are unsatisfying. They often seem artificial, internally inconsistent, and even conceptually incoherent. Despite a long and continuing history of racial discrimination in the United States, many of the problems with the Supreme Court\u27s racial jurisprudence stem from the Court\u27s willingness to view the current distribution of societal resources as establishing a colorblind, race-neutral baseline that can be used to make equality determinations. As a result, the current rules are as likely to facilitate racial discrimination as to prevent it, or to remedy the lingering effects of past discrimination
For decades, the Supreme Court has sharply divided in equal protection race discrimination cases. As...
Part I of this article argues that the Supreme Court lacks the institutional competence to formulate...
This Article suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court, through its decisions in cases alleging race disc...
The Supreme Courts current doctrinal rules governing racial discrimination and affirmative action ar...
Liberals have generally cheered the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger as validatin...
Equal protection law today is divided. When minorities challenge laws of general application and arg...
Perhaps the most exasperating aspect of racial discrimination in the United States is the self-right...
The United States has a long and somewhat conflicted history of espousing egalitarian values and yet...
The present Supreme Court has been noticeably unreceptive to legal claims asserted by racial minorit...
Part of the "Symposium from Brown to Bakke to Grutter: Constitutionalizing and defining racial equal...
The contemporary debate about race in the United States is perplexing. Each side seems genuinely to ...
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the stat...
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminato...
Espousing colorblindness as the defining feature of the Equal Protection Clause, a bare majority of ...
This Article will explore the origins of the Court’s color-blind interpretation of the Fourteenth Am...
For decades, the Supreme Court has sharply divided in equal protection race discrimination cases. As...
Part I of this article argues that the Supreme Court lacks the institutional competence to formulate...
This Article suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court, through its decisions in cases alleging race disc...
The Supreme Courts current doctrinal rules governing racial discrimination and affirmative action ar...
Liberals have generally cheered the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger as validatin...
Equal protection law today is divided. When minorities challenge laws of general application and arg...
Perhaps the most exasperating aspect of racial discrimination in the United States is the self-right...
The United States has a long and somewhat conflicted history of espousing egalitarian values and yet...
The present Supreme Court has been noticeably unreceptive to legal claims asserted by racial minorit...
Part of the "Symposium from Brown to Bakke to Grutter: Constitutionalizing and defining racial equal...
The contemporary debate about race in the United States is perplexing. Each side seems genuinely to ...
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the stat...
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminato...
Espousing colorblindness as the defining feature of the Equal Protection Clause, a bare majority of ...
This Article will explore the origins of the Court’s color-blind interpretation of the Fourteenth Am...
For decades, the Supreme Court has sharply divided in equal protection race discrimination cases. As...
Part I of this article argues that the Supreme Court lacks the institutional competence to formulate...
This Article suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court, through its decisions in cases alleging race disc...