For decades, the Supreme Court has sharply divided in equal protection race discrimination cases. As commonly described, the Justices disagree about whether the Equal Protection Clause is properly interpreted through a colorblind anticlassification principle concerned with individualism or through an antisubordination principle concerned with inequalities in group status. This Article uncovers a third perspective on equal protection in the opinions of swing Justices who have voted to uphold and to restrict race conscious remedies because of concern about social divisiveness which, they believe, both extreme racial stratification and unconstrained racial remedies can engender. The Article terms this third perspective on equal protection conc...
Liberals have generally cheered the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger as validatin...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminato...
Espousing colorblindness as the defining feature of the Equal Protection Clause, a bare majority of ...
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the stat...
Some commentators, perhaps a minority, have argued that the Equal Protection Clause should be read t...
Scholars and judges have long assumed that the Equal Protection Clause is concerned only with state ...
In this Article, the author explores Grutter v. Bollinger from the vantage point of the colorblindne...
When Brown v. Board of Education\u27 prohibited racial segregation in public education, it inaugurat...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
In this Article, the author explores Grutter v. Bollinger from the vantage point of the colorblindne...
This Article will explore the origins of the Court’s color-blind interpretation of the Fourteenth Am...
This Note will examine affirmative action jurisprudence, and explore the broader implications of the...
Is the Constitution colorblind? Should preferential treatment for minorities be construed to violate...
Liberals have generally cheered the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger as validatin...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminato...
Espousing colorblindness as the defining feature of the Equal Protection Clause, a bare majority of ...
The Supreme Court increasingly has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as a mandate for the stat...
Some commentators, perhaps a minority, have argued that the Equal Protection Clause should be read t...
Scholars and judges have long assumed that the Equal Protection Clause is concerned only with state ...
In this Article, the author explores Grutter v. Bollinger from the vantage point of the colorblindne...
When Brown v. Board of Education\u27 prohibited racial segregation in public education, it inaugurat...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
In this Article, the author explores Grutter v. Bollinger from the vantage point of the colorblindne...
This Article will explore the origins of the Court’s color-blind interpretation of the Fourteenth Am...
This Note will examine affirmative action jurisprudence, and explore the broader implications of the...
Is the Constitution colorblind? Should preferential treatment for minorities be construed to violate...
Liberals have generally cheered the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger as validatin...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...
This Article explores a great paradox at the heart of the prevailing paradigm of American antidiscri...