When potentially associated with the likelihood of outcome, missing participant data represents a serious potential source of bias in randomized trials. Authors of systematic reviews frequently face this problem when conducting meta-analyses. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic survey of the relevant literature to identify proposed approaches for how systematic review authors should handle missing participant data when conducting a meta-analysis
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing da...
Background: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing d...
BACKGROUND:: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing ...
Abstract Background When potentially associated with ...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order for authors of systematic reviews to address missing data in ran...
Objectives: To describe how systematic review authors report and address categories of participants ...
Systematic reviewer authors intending to include all randomized participants in their meta-analyses ...
Systematic reviewer authors intending to include all randomized participants in their meta-analyses ...
Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: Conclusions: ...
Missing outcome data of trial participants is a frequent phenomenon in RCTs and may represent a seri...
Missing participant outcome data (MOD) are ubiquitous in clinical trials and may threaten the validi...
Objective Missing outcome data are a common problem in clinical trials and systematic reviews, as it...
We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches...
Abstract Background There is no consensus on how authors conducting...
Objective: To assess analytic approaches randomized controlled trial (RCT) authors use to address mi...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing da...
Background: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing d...
BACKGROUND:: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing ...
Abstract Background When potentially associated with ...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order for authors of systematic reviews to address missing data in ran...
Objectives: To describe how systematic review authors report and address categories of participants ...
Systematic reviewer authors intending to include all randomized participants in their meta-analyses ...
Systematic reviewer authors intending to include all randomized participants in their meta-analyses ...
Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: Conclusions: ...
Missing outcome data of trial participants is a frequent phenomenon in RCTs and may represent a seri...
Missing participant outcome data (MOD) are ubiquitous in clinical trials and may threaten the validi...
Objective Missing outcome data are a common problem in clinical trials and systematic reviews, as it...
We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches...
Abstract Background There is no consensus on how authors conducting...
Objective: To assess analytic approaches randomized controlled trial (RCT) authors use to address mi...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives: To describe how systematic reviewers are reporting missing da...
Background: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing d...
BACKGROUND:: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing ...