We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches for how and what randomised clinical trial (RCT) authors should report on missing participant data and, on the basis of these approaches, to propose guidance for RCT authors
BACKGROUND:: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing ...
The clinical study with no missing data has yet to be conducted – and never will be! Yet, despite it...
Objectives: To describe how systematic review authors report and address categories of participants ...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literat...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order for authors of systematic reviews to address missing data in ran...
Objective: To assess analytic approaches randomized controlled trial (RCT) authors use to address mi...
When potentially associated with the likelihood of outcome, missing participant data represents a se...
Evidence-based research in health care has been developed well in recent years. One of the biggest c...
Missing data is a potential source of bias in the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), wh...
Missing outcome data of trial participants is a frequent phenomenon in RCTs and may represent a seri...
UA Open Access Publishing Fund.Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) randomise participants...
UA Open Access Publishing FundBackground Missing outcome data is a threat to the validity of treatme...
Objectives To analyse the amount, reporting and handling of missing data, approach to intention-to-t...
Background: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing d...
markdownabstractThe clinical study with no missing data has yet to be conducted – and never will be!...
BACKGROUND:: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing ...
The clinical study with no missing data has yet to be conducted – and never will be! Yet, despite it...
Objectives: To describe how systematic review authors report and address categories of participants ...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjectives We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literat...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order for authors of systematic reviews to address missing data in ran...
Objective: To assess analytic approaches randomized controlled trial (RCT) authors use to address mi...
When potentially associated with the likelihood of outcome, missing participant data represents a se...
Evidence-based research in health care has been developed well in recent years. One of the biggest c...
Missing data is a potential source of bias in the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), wh...
Missing outcome data of trial participants is a frequent phenomenon in RCTs and may represent a seri...
UA Open Access Publishing Fund.Introduction: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) randomise participants...
UA Open Access Publishing FundBackground Missing outcome data is a threat to the validity of treatme...
Objectives To analyse the amount, reporting and handling of missing data, approach to intention-to-t...
Background: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing d...
markdownabstractThe clinical study with no missing data has yet to be conducted – and never will be!...
BACKGROUND:: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine how researchers report missing ...
The clinical study with no missing data has yet to be conducted – and never will be! Yet, despite it...
Objectives: To describe how systematic review authors report and address categories of participants ...