This paper reports lab data from four games in order to analyze and compare the motivations behind monetary punishment and reward and their non-monetary counterparts, disapproval and approval, an important question given that both types of punishment/rewards affect cooperation and norm compliance. The results in our games support the hypothesis that a motivation akin to reciprocity plays the key role for approval and disapproval whereas payoff comparisons play the key role for monetary rewards and punishment
"In social decision making, punishing non-cooperation and rewarding cooperation may not only affect ...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Material punishment has been suggested to play a key role in sustaining human cooperation. Experimen...
We examine rewards and punishments in a simple proposer-responder game. The proposer first makes an ...
We design experiments to study the extent to which individuals differ in their motivations behind co...
Prior studies have shown that selfish behavior is reduced when co–players have the opportunity to a...
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Games and Economic Behav...
We examine demands for rewards and punishments in a simple proposer-responder game. The proposer fir...
This paper uses Public Good Games conducted in rural Rwanda to analyze the impact of rewards and pe...
While the opportunity to punish selfish and reward generous behavior coexist in many instances in da...
We explores the motivations behind costly punishment in social dilemmas, specifically focusing on re...
Do opportunities to punish non-punishers help to stabilize cooperation? Or do opportunities to punis...
Both peer-to-peer punishments and rewards can be effective in increasing cooperation in dilemma situ...
We provide lab data from four different games that allow us to study whether peopl...
In the Ultimatum Game, a proposer suggests how to split a sum of money with a responder. If the resp...
"In social decision making, punishing non-cooperation and rewarding cooperation may not only affect ...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Material punishment has been suggested to play a key role in sustaining human cooperation. Experimen...
We examine rewards and punishments in a simple proposer-responder game. The proposer first makes an ...
We design experiments to study the extent to which individuals differ in their motivations behind co...
Prior studies have shown that selfish behavior is reduced when co–players have the opportunity to a...
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Games and Economic Behav...
We examine demands for rewards and punishments in a simple proposer-responder game. The proposer fir...
This paper uses Public Good Games conducted in rural Rwanda to analyze the impact of rewards and pe...
While the opportunity to punish selfish and reward generous behavior coexist in many instances in da...
We explores the motivations behind costly punishment in social dilemmas, specifically focusing on re...
Do opportunities to punish non-punishers help to stabilize cooperation? Or do opportunities to punis...
Both peer-to-peer punishments and rewards can be effective in increasing cooperation in dilemma situ...
We provide lab data from four different games that allow us to study whether peopl...
In the Ultimatum Game, a proposer suggests how to split a sum of money with a responder. If the resp...
"In social decision making, punishing non-cooperation and rewarding cooperation may not only affect ...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Material punishment has been suggested to play a key role in sustaining human cooperation. Experimen...