Add to ORKGAssertion by states of a right to regulate conduct beyond their borders has been a source of frequent controversy and serious international conflicts for more than half a century. Economic, political and technological developments have forced jurisdictional analysis out of the neat confines of the territoriality principle, and states have asserted the right to regulate foreign conduct on the basis of the effects of such conduct within their borders
The far reach of United States antitrust laws has been a source of considerable irritation to many a...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
Assertion by states of a right to regulate conduct beyond their borders has been a source of frequen...
As students of international law know, there has been a long standing dispute between the United Kin...
It is no accident that many of the most provocative disputes about the allocation of jurisdiction am...
In the last few years, and mostly unnoticed, courts have adopted a radically different approach to i...
This Note argues that the Restatement Third provisions fail to provide a precise outline of jurisdic...
One of the corollaries of sovereignty is the duty of non-intervention in exclusive jurisdiction of o...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
With the rise of transnational crime, domestic courts are increasingly called upon to make decisions...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
This Article contends that the current state of the debate over the balancing of interests in the ex...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
The far reach of United States antitrust laws has been a source of considerable irritation to many a...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
Assertion by states of a right to regulate conduct beyond their borders has been a source of frequen...
As students of international law know, there has been a long standing dispute between the United Kin...
It is no accident that many of the most provocative disputes about the allocation of jurisdiction am...
In the last few years, and mostly unnoticed, courts have adopted a radically different approach to i...
This Note argues that the Restatement Third provisions fail to provide a precise outline of jurisdic...
One of the corollaries of sovereignty is the duty of non-intervention in exclusive jurisdiction of o...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
With the rise of transnational crime, domestic courts are increasingly called upon to make decisions...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
This Article contends that the current state of the debate over the balancing of interests in the ex...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
The far reach of United States antitrust laws has been a source of considerable irritation to many a...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...