Add to ORKGAs students of international law know, there has been a long standing dispute between the United Kingdom and the United States over the doctrines of jurisdiction and sovereignty in the practice of international law. In two parts our nations do not quarrel. First, we agree that every nation has the right to exercise jurisdiction over its nationals and over non-nationals within its territory. Second, we agree that every nation has the right to exercise personal jurisdiction over its nationals residing abroad
However, the trend to apply United States antitrust laws to international trade agreements has given...
Chief Justice Marshall articulated this fundamental canon of U.S. statutory construction, reflective...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
As students of international law know, there has been a long standing dispute between the United Kin...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
The extraterritorial application of national laws has become a battle ground over the last forty yea...
The extraterritorial enforcement of U.S. antitrust laws has long generated discontent between the U...
Assertion by states of a right to regulate conduct beyond their borders has been a source of frequen...
This Comment will review the United States approach to subject matter jurisdiction determinations in...
Beginning in the late eighteenth century and running well into the twentieth, the United States clai...
This comment will outline the international response to extraterritorial application of United State...
It is no accident that many of the most provocative disputes about the allocation of jurisdiction am...
One of the corollaries of sovereignty is the duty of non-intervention in exclusive jurisdiction of o...
The extraterritorial application of U.S. law was a settled issue for a long time. For about sixty ye...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
However, the trend to apply United States antitrust laws to international trade agreements has given...
Chief Justice Marshall articulated this fundamental canon of U.S. statutory construction, reflective...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...
As students of international law know, there has been a long standing dispute between the United Kin...
Few subjects in international law raise such incorrigible conflicts of interest as the exercise of e...
The extraterritorial application of national laws has become a battle ground over the last forty yea...
The extraterritorial enforcement of U.S. antitrust laws has long generated discontent between the U...
Assertion by states of a right to regulate conduct beyond their borders has been a source of frequen...
This Comment will review the United States approach to subject matter jurisdiction determinations in...
Beginning in the late eighteenth century and running well into the twentieth, the United States clai...
This comment will outline the international response to extraterritorial application of United State...
It is no accident that many of the most provocative disputes about the allocation of jurisdiction am...
One of the corollaries of sovereignty is the duty of non-intervention in exclusive jurisdiction of o...
The extraterritorial application of U.S. law was a settled issue for a long time. For about sixty ye...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
However, the trend to apply United States antitrust laws to international trade agreements has given...
Chief Justice Marshall articulated this fundamental canon of U.S. statutory construction, reflective...
Extraterritoriality is a negative form of transnationalism. It creates a paradox among state regulat...