In the Soering Case, the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) held that Great Britain would violate the European Convention on Human Rights (European Convention) if it extradited Jens Soering to the United States to face murder charges and a potential death sentence. The decision captured world attention because the case had tabloid appeal-U.S. prosecutors believed Soering had collaborated with Elizabeth Haysom, his girlfriend and the heiress to the Astor steel fortune, to murder her parents-and because the decision condemned as inhuman and degrading the conditions on death row in U.S. prisons
The process of extradition is a vital component of International Criminal Law as a means of ensuring...
This article provides a critical overview of some key human rights developments since January 2012 i...
This Article examines extradition and jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime, focusing on the rela...
In the Soering Case, the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) held that Great Britain wou...
Part I of this Article discusses the rising number of extradition requests by the United States, the...
This article examines the role of the judiciary in protecting fundamental rights in European extradi...
This article examines the role of the judiciary in protecting fundamental rights in European extradi...
There exists a perception within the UK that human rights law emanating from Europe acts to the detr...
Although the growth of extradition treaties has assisted in the prosecution of suspects who are not ...
This article examines the impact of the European Court\u27s right to life jurisprudence on the issue...
Over the last 10 years, there have been numerous cases of ECHR-state party complicity in torture car...
The question of the universality of human rights has arisen in the context of United Kingdom and Eur...
The certified question and the legal impact of the Court of Justice\u27s preliminary ruling on that ...
On January 1, 1990, the Eighth Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights came into force. ...
In Human Rights Watch v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the UK Investigat...
The process of extradition is a vital component of International Criminal Law as a means of ensuring...
This article provides a critical overview of some key human rights developments since January 2012 i...
This Article examines extradition and jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime, focusing on the rela...
In the Soering Case, the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) held that Great Britain wou...
Part I of this Article discusses the rising number of extradition requests by the United States, the...
This article examines the role of the judiciary in protecting fundamental rights in European extradi...
This article examines the role of the judiciary in protecting fundamental rights in European extradi...
There exists a perception within the UK that human rights law emanating from Europe acts to the detr...
Although the growth of extradition treaties has assisted in the prosecution of suspects who are not ...
This article examines the impact of the European Court\u27s right to life jurisprudence on the issue...
Over the last 10 years, there have been numerous cases of ECHR-state party complicity in torture car...
The question of the universality of human rights has arisen in the context of United Kingdom and Eur...
The certified question and the legal impact of the Court of Justice\u27s preliminary ruling on that ...
On January 1, 1990, the Eighth Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights came into force. ...
In Human Rights Watch v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the UK Investigat...
The process of extradition is a vital component of International Criminal Law as a means of ensuring...
This article provides a critical overview of some key human rights developments since January 2012 i...
This Article examines extradition and jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime, focusing on the rela...