In the Soering Case, the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) held that Great Britain would violate the European Convention on Human Rights (European Convention) if it extradited Jens Soering to the United States to face murder charges and a potential death sentence. The decision captured world attention because the case had tabloid appeal-U.S. prosecutors believed Soering had collaborated with Elizabeth Haysom, his girlfriend and the heiress to the Astor steel fortune, to murder her parents-and because the decision condemned as inhuman and degrading the conditions on death row in U.S. prisons
There exists a perception within the UK that human rights law emanating from Europe acts to the detr...
The legal revolution brought about by the Human Rights Act 1998 has affected arcane legal areas such...
In this year 2016, precisely on March 30, it was released the trial of the case involving the death ...
In the Soering Case, the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) held that Great Britain wou...
article published in law reviewPart I of this Article discusses the rising number of extradition req...
The death penalty presents an issue where a clearly stated norm that is widely held by U.S. allies e...
Over the past two decades, the European Union, via the European Human Rights Commission, has prevent...
ABSTRACT: Each state decides on the modalities and conditions under which it grants extradition, eve...
Over the last 10 years, there have been numerous cases of ECHR-state party complicity in torture car...
The Öcalan judgment may well be regarded as a landmark authority contributing to the development of ...
In Human Rights Watch v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the UK Investigat...
This article examines the role of the judiciary in protecting fundamental rights in European extradi...
The question of the universality of human rights has arisen in the context of United Kingdom and Eur...
This article reviews the case law pertaining to human rights and extradition law, looking at whether...
The article examines the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law in relation to extraordinar...
There exists a perception within the UK that human rights law emanating from Europe acts to the detr...
The legal revolution brought about by the Human Rights Act 1998 has affected arcane legal areas such...
In this year 2016, precisely on March 30, it was released the trial of the case involving the death ...
In the Soering Case, the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) held that Great Britain wou...
article published in law reviewPart I of this Article discusses the rising number of extradition req...
The death penalty presents an issue where a clearly stated norm that is widely held by U.S. allies e...
Over the past two decades, the European Union, via the European Human Rights Commission, has prevent...
ABSTRACT: Each state decides on the modalities and conditions under which it grants extradition, eve...
Over the last 10 years, there have been numerous cases of ECHR-state party complicity in torture car...
The Öcalan judgment may well be regarded as a landmark authority contributing to the development of ...
In Human Rights Watch v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the UK Investigat...
This article examines the role of the judiciary in protecting fundamental rights in European extradi...
The question of the universality of human rights has arisen in the context of United Kingdom and Eur...
This article reviews the case law pertaining to human rights and extradition law, looking at whether...
The article examines the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law in relation to extraordinar...
There exists a perception within the UK that human rights law emanating from Europe acts to the detr...
The legal revolution brought about by the Human Rights Act 1998 has affected arcane legal areas such...
In this year 2016, precisely on March 30, it was released the trial of the case involving the death ...