Employer hiring of permanent replacements for economic strikers has become one of the most controversial labor law issues since the early 1980s. While such hirings have occurred for over a century in the United States and were recognized as lawful in 1938 by the Supreme Court, the extensive use and threat to use permanent replacements by major U.S. employers during the 1980s and early 1990s have intensified attention and debate surrounding the issue
[Excerpt] United States labor law on workers\u27 right to strike meets international human rights st...
American workers in the 1990s are finding that the employment landscape has changed dramatically. Ex...
The strike is a necessary part of collective bargaining. Workers should not ordinarily lose their jo...
Employer hiring of permanent replacements for economic strikers has become one of the most controver...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. in 1938, employers hav...
Introduction In a recent article in the North Carolina Law Review, Louisiana State University Law Pr...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
One hundred and seventy employees of the respondent, predominantly union members, engaged in an eco...
In a recent article we discuss the issue of the use of permanent replacements for striking employees...
It is argued in many circles that a structural change occurred in U.S. collective bargaining in the ...
The collective bargaining agreement between the Laidlaw Corporation and Local 681 of the Internation...
In this article, we directly attack Professors Wachter and Cohen\u27s assertion regarding the econom...
Experience indicates that in most instances the right to strike is not an essential part of the publ...
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to offset employers’ superior power in coll...
The purpose of this Recent Development is to examine the issues surrounding discharged permanent rep...
[Excerpt] United States labor law on workers\u27 right to strike meets international human rights st...
American workers in the 1990s are finding that the employment landscape has changed dramatically. Ex...
The strike is a necessary part of collective bargaining. Workers should not ordinarily lose their jo...
Employer hiring of permanent replacements for economic strikers has become one of the most controver...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. in 1938, employers hav...
Introduction In a recent article in the North Carolina Law Review, Louisiana State University Law Pr...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
One hundred and seventy employees of the respondent, predominantly union members, engaged in an eco...
In a recent article we discuss the issue of the use of permanent replacements for striking employees...
It is argued in many circles that a structural change occurred in U.S. collective bargaining in the ...
The collective bargaining agreement between the Laidlaw Corporation and Local 681 of the Internation...
In this article, we directly attack Professors Wachter and Cohen\u27s assertion regarding the econom...
Experience indicates that in most instances the right to strike is not an essential part of the publ...
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to offset employers’ superior power in coll...
The purpose of this Recent Development is to examine the issues surrounding discharged permanent rep...
[Excerpt] United States labor law on workers\u27 right to strike meets international human rights st...
American workers in the 1990s are finding that the employment landscape has changed dramatically. Ex...
The strike is a necessary part of collective bargaining. Workers should not ordinarily lose their jo...