Add to ORKGThe government bears most of the risk of error in a criminal trial: factual error because of the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and legal error because of the prohibition on government appeal of acquittals. Neither of these procedural mechanisms has a counterpart in civil procedure
Ambiguity aversion is a person\u27s rational attitude towards the indeterminacy of the probability t...
A recent Ninth Circuit decision, prohibiting peremptory challenges on the basis of sexual orientatio...
The United States Supreme Court held its 1970 decision In re Winship that in criminal prosecutions t...
The government bears most of the risk of error in a criminal trial: factual error because of the req...
This paper challenges the commonly held idea that the appeals process lowers the occurrence of legal...
This paper presents an economic model of the harmful error rule in criminal appeals. We test the imp...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
Rules of criminal procedure, like all rules of legal procedure, exist to advance the goals of the co...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
Every state provides appellate review of criminal judgments, yet little research examines which fact...
This article seeks to end fifty years of confusion over how to proceed when a criminal defendant wan...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimo...
Ambiguity aversion is a person\u27s rational attitude towards the indeterminacy of the probability t...
A recent Ninth Circuit decision, prohibiting peremptory challenges on the basis of sexual orientatio...
The United States Supreme Court held its 1970 decision In re Winship that in criminal prosecutions t...
The government bears most of the risk of error in a criminal trial: factual error because of the req...
This paper challenges the commonly held idea that the appeals process lowers the occurrence of legal...
This paper presents an economic model of the harmful error rule in criminal appeals. We test the imp...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
Rules of criminal procedure, like all rules of legal procedure, exist to advance the goals of the co...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
Every state provides appellate review of criminal judgments, yet little research examines which fact...
This article seeks to end fifty years of confusion over how to proceed when a criminal defendant wan...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimo...
Ambiguity aversion is a person\u27s rational attitude towards the indeterminacy of the probability t...
A recent Ninth Circuit decision, prohibiting peremptory challenges on the basis of sexual orientatio...
The United States Supreme Court held its 1970 decision In re Winship that in criminal prosecutions t...