The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimony was placed in evidence by the prosecution, to which the defendant\u27s attorney failed to object. The point was sought to be raised on appeal under N. J. Comp. Stat. 1910 sec. 136, which provides that, in criminal cases, if the plaintiff in error on the trial below suffered manifest wrong or injury, either in the admission or rejection of testimony, whether objection was made thereto or not * * * the appellate court shall remedy such wrong or injury * * * and order a new trial. Held, the statute did not apply. State v. Cappiello (N. J. 1930) 151 Atl. 737
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
One of the paradoxes of the law is presented by the large number of decisions discussing evidence po...
Defendant appealed from conviction of murder because of the incompetence and negligence of his attor...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
The testimony given on a trial for murder indicated that the defendant had shot and killed one of hi...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
In affirming a conviction on an indictment for conspiracy to cheat and defraud, the Illinois Appella...
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict wa...
Criminal Law - Directed Verdict of Acquittal - The accused was convicted of crime. Error was assigne...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
To represent the defendant, accused of robbery, the court at public expense, appointed an attorney, ...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
One of the paradoxes of the law is presented by the large number of decisions discussing evidence po...
Defendant appealed from conviction of murder because of the incompetence and negligence of his attor...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
The testimony given on a trial for murder indicated that the defendant had shot and killed one of hi...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
In affirming a conviction on an indictment for conspiracy to cheat and defraud, the Illinois Appella...
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict wa...
Criminal Law - Directed Verdict of Acquittal - The accused was convicted of crime. Error was assigne...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
To represent the defendant, accused of robbery, the court at public expense, appointed an attorney, ...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
One of the paradoxes of the law is presented by the large number of decisions discussing evidence po...