The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epis-temological approach to argumentation. This approach has provided strict rules for several kinds of argu-ments. These kinds may be brought into a system of basic irreducible types, which rely on different parts of epistemology: deductive logic, probability theory, utility theory. The system reduces a huge mass of differ-ent argument schemes to basic types and gives them an epistemological foundation
Abstract: The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument, i.e. a theory that rega...
The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument, i.e. a theory that regards provid...
One of the crucial problems of argumentation schemes as illustrated in (Walton, Reed & Macagno 2008)...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epistemologic...
The article presents and critically discusses Walton's (and Reed's and Macagno's) argument scheme ap...
The contribution critically discusses Walton's (and Reed’s and Macagno’s) argumentation scheme appro...
The article critically discusses Walton’s (and co-authors’) argument scheme approach to good argumen...
Argumentation schemes can be described as abstract structures representing the most generic types of...
The paper distinguishes, in its first part, different epistemological approaches to argumentation th...
Our typology is based on two ground adequacy factors, one logical and one epistemic. Logically, the ...
This contribution gives an overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation. It explains wh...
The article develops and justifies, on the basis of the epistemological argumentation theory, two ce...
Abstract: The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument, i.e. a theory that rega...
The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument, i.e. a theory that regards provid...
One of the crucial problems of argumentation schemes as illustrated in (Walton, Reed & Macagno 2008)...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epistemologic...
The article presents and critically discusses Walton's (and Reed's and Macagno's) argument scheme ap...
The contribution critically discusses Walton's (and Reed’s and Macagno’s) argumentation scheme appro...
The article critically discusses Walton’s (and co-authors’) argument scheme approach to good argumen...
Argumentation schemes can be described as abstract structures representing the most generic types of...
The paper distinguishes, in its first part, different epistemological approaches to argumentation th...
Our typology is based on two ground adequacy factors, one logical and one epistemic. Logically, the ...
This contribution gives an overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation. It explains wh...
The article develops and justifies, on the basis of the epistemological argumentation theory, two ce...
Abstract: The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument, i.e. a theory that rega...
The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument, i.e. a theory that regards provid...
One of the crucial problems of argumentation schemes as illustrated in (Walton, Reed & Macagno 2008)...