Add to ORKGOur typology is based on two ground adequacy factors, one logical and one epistemic. Logically, the step from premises to conclusion may be conclusive or only ceteris paribus. Epistemically, warrants may be backed a priori or a posteriori. Hence there are four types of arguments: conclusive a priori, defeasible a priori, defeasible a posteriori, and prima facie conclusive a posteriori. We shall give an example of each and compare our scheme with other typologies
Abstract. We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the bas...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the bas...
The central methodology in western philosophy from the ancient Greeks is argumentation. Dialectical ...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epis-temologi...
We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for dev...
The article develops and justifies, on the basis of the epistemological argumentation theory, two ce...
This paper is an attempt to identify and provide the normative conditions for presumptions and for p...
Current practice in logic increasingly accords recognition to abductive, presumptive or plausible ar...
The concept of arguments schemes is fundamental for argumentation studies; but its implementation is...
The concept of warrant reflects Toulmin\u27s general insights that validity in reasoning comes in ma...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epistemologic...
Are there any logical norms for argument evaluation besides soundness and inductive strength? The pa...
Abstract. We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the bas...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the bas...
The central methodology in western philosophy from the ancient Greeks is argumentation. Dialectical ...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epis-temologi...
We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for dev...
The article develops and justifies, on the basis of the epistemological argumentation theory, two ce...
This paper is an attempt to identify and provide the normative conditions for presumptions and for p...
Current practice in logic increasingly accords recognition to abductive, presumptive or plausible ar...
The concept of arguments schemes is fundamental for argumentation studies; but its implementation is...
The concept of warrant reflects Toulmin\u27s general insights that validity in reasoning comes in ma...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epistemologic...
Are there any logical norms for argument evaluation besides soundness and inductive strength? The pa...
Abstract. We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the bas...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the bas...