If we want reasoning to bridge cultural differences, argumentation theory has to show when and why to invoke a “disposition to co-operate.” But it is crucial to re-interpret co-operation as a function of relationships and processes, not as a disposition of individuals. Co-operative relationships and processes can then provide the vital path from individual scepticism to the mutual trust needed to work through difficult disputes
Deep disagreement isn’t about the irresolvability of actual disputes, it is about one of the inheren...
Is reaching an agreement a product of strong arguing-making and argument-having? Mediators are train...
Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a c...
I will connect the literature on deep disagreements with the literature on trust to construct a two-...
Conflict and trust have typically been considered if not opposites at least incompatible. However, r...
What is trust? How does it function as a primary virtue for persuasive arguments? How does its presu...
People argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these ca...
This thesis addresses two problems of trust: 1. Knowledge on Trust: If we are provided with infor...
Interpersonal relationships can be fragile. The mere perception of opportunistic behavior can lead t...
The theoretical possibility of deep disagreement gives rise to an important practical problem: a dee...
People argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these ca...
This article examines how people develop their ideas with each other through the use of argument seq...
We know how people could reason well to resolve disputes. We don’t yet know why they don’t. Which th...
Some exchanges of reasons are agonistic. Others work mutually, as in planning and adjusting divergen...
Trust has been acknowledged as an important aspect of interorganizational relationships. Yet, limite...
Deep disagreement isn’t about the irresolvability of actual disputes, it is about one of the inheren...
Is reaching an agreement a product of strong arguing-making and argument-having? Mediators are train...
Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a c...
I will connect the literature on deep disagreements with the literature on trust to construct a two-...
Conflict and trust have typically been considered if not opposites at least incompatible. However, r...
What is trust? How does it function as a primary virtue for persuasive arguments? How does its presu...
People argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these ca...
This thesis addresses two problems of trust: 1. Knowledge on Trust: If we are provided with infor...
Interpersonal relationships can be fragile. The mere perception of opportunistic behavior can lead t...
The theoretical possibility of deep disagreement gives rise to an important practical problem: a dee...
People argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these ca...
This article examines how people develop their ideas with each other through the use of argument seq...
We know how people could reason well to resolve disputes. We don’t yet know why they don’t. Which th...
Some exchanges of reasons are agonistic. Others work mutually, as in planning and adjusting divergen...
Trust has been acknowledged as an important aspect of interorganizational relationships. Yet, limite...
Deep disagreement isn’t about the irresolvability of actual disputes, it is about one of the inheren...
Is reaching an agreement a product of strong arguing-making and argument-having? Mediators are train...
Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a c...