Add to ORKGPeople argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these cases, most theorists assume arguers are left with the same disagreement from which they started. This is too optimistic, since disagreement might instead escalate, and this may happen because of the argumentative practice, not in spite of it. These dangers depend on epistemological, pragmatic, and cultural factors, and show why arguers should be (and are) careful in picking their dialogical fights
The escalation of disagreement into overt conflict in social interaction can be avoided, if disagree...
The paper starts from scepticism that all argumentation is dialogical or that all dialogue types are...
Deep disagreement isn’t about the irresolvability of actual disputes, it is about one of the inheren...
People argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these ca...
When epistemic peers disagree, what should a virtuous arguer do? Several options have been defended ...
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
The shocking statement made by Robert Fogelin over 20 years ago when he claimed that discourses that...
I will connect the literature on deep disagreements with the literature on trust to construct a two-...
The theoretical possibility of deep disagreement gives rise to an important practical problem: a dee...
Accounts of deep disagreements can generally be categorized as optimistic or pessimistic. Pessimisti...
Pragma-dialectical theory (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004 ) explains that a critical discussion h...
Some normative problems are difficult because of the number and complexity of the issues they involv...
In theory, flawed arguments are not individually sufficient to justify a conclusion, but several may...
who “just disagree ” cannot just “leave it alone”—or, better yet, try to resolve their disagreements...
Argumentative discussion is successful only if, at the concluding stage, both parties can agree abou...
The escalation of disagreement into overt conflict in social interaction can be avoided, if disagree...
The paper starts from scepticism that all argumentation is dialogical or that all dialogue types are...
Deep disagreement isn’t about the irresolvability of actual disputes, it is about one of the inheren...
People argue to reconcile differences of opinion, but reconciliation may fail to happen. In these ca...
When epistemic peers disagree, what should a virtuous arguer do? Several options have been defended ...
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
The shocking statement made by Robert Fogelin over 20 years ago when he claimed that discourses that...
I will connect the literature on deep disagreements with the literature on trust to construct a two-...
The theoretical possibility of deep disagreement gives rise to an important practical problem: a dee...
Accounts of deep disagreements can generally be categorized as optimistic or pessimistic. Pessimisti...
Pragma-dialectical theory (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004 ) explains that a critical discussion h...
Some normative problems are difficult because of the number and complexity of the issues they involv...
In theory, flawed arguments are not individually sufficient to justify a conclusion, but several may...
who “just disagree ” cannot just “leave it alone”—or, better yet, try to resolve their disagreements...
Argumentative discussion is successful only if, at the concluding stage, both parties can agree abou...
The escalation of disagreement into overt conflict in social interaction can be avoided, if disagree...
The paper starts from scepticism that all argumentation is dialogical or that all dialogue types are...
Deep disagreement isn’t about the irresolvability of actual disputes, it is about one of the inheren...