Add to ORKGIn Hidden in Plain Sight, Barbara Bennett Woodhouse argues for the advancement of children’s rights through the development of a child-centric perspective. She identifies five principles to further that goal, including the principles of agency and dignity. These principles shed light on the problem of shackling juveniles during their delinquency proceedings. While a recent United States Supreme Court ruling barred indiscriminate shackling for all adult defendants, the status of juveniles remains unclear. Yet even in states that do not shackle juveniles without cause, significant problems remain. This Comment identifies and examines these problems, arguing for increased attention to shackled juveniles’ due process and fundamental dignity rig...
For over a century, the United States Supreme Court has held, in sum and substance, that students do...
Detained children routinely appear before Michigan\u27s juvenile courts shackled with handcuffs, leg...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
In Hidden in Plain Sight, Barbara Bennett Woodhouse argues for the advancement of children’s rights ...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
I. Introduction II. Leading Supreme Court Cases Defining Procedural Due Process Rights of Juveniles ...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
As the juvenile justice system evolves into a more punitive system, due process protections are esse...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
This Article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Gault...
Today\u27s juvenile courtroom functions quite differently than did its 1899 Chicago ancestor. During...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
In the case of Reno v. Flores, the United States Supreme Court held that the indefinite detention of...
The right against self-incrimination has been a part of American law since before the enactment of t...
For over a century, the United States Supreme Court has held, in sum and substance, that students do...
Detained children routinely appear before Michigan\u27s juvenile courts shackled with handcuffs, leg...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
In Hidden in Plain Sight, Barbara Bennett Woodhouse argues for the advancement of children’s rights ...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
I. Introduction II. Leading Supreme Court Cases Defining Procedural Due Process Rights of Juveniles ...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
As the juvenile justice system evolves into a more punitive system, due process protections are esse...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
This Article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Gault...
Today\u27s juvenile courtroom functions quite differently than did its 1899 Chicago ancestor. During...
The landmark Supreme Court decision in In re Gault established, among other things, a juvenile\u27s ...
In the case of Reno v. Flores, the United States Supreme Court held that the indefinite detention of...
The right against self-incrimination has been a part of American law since before the enactment of t...
For over a century, the United States Supreme Court has held, in sum and substance, that students do...
Detained children routinely appear before Michigan\u27s juvenile courts shackled with handcuffs, leg...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...