Add to ORKGIn the case of Reno v. Flores, the United States Supreme Court held that the indefinite detention of unaccompanied, immigrant children without a mandatory hearing before an immigration judge did not violate the children\u27s substantive or procedural due process rights. To fully examine the procedural and substantive due process rights of these children, the Article engages in an analysis of children\u27s due process rights in general, and then places the Reno v. Flores decision in context
Children rights advocates and scholars alike continue to call for the development of innovative and ...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
In the case of Reno v. Flores, the United States Supreme Court held that the indefinite detention of...
In 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that when the federal government detains an unacco...
United States citizens, who are children of aliens residing unlawfully in the country, are routinely...
This article analyses United States (US) federal court jurisprudence to determine the legal rights o...
This work addresses the need for parallel due process rights for children by investigating the natur...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
Concepts that are useful in other areas of human rights break down in the context of children. Becau...
Approximately seventy percent of the juveniles arrested for violation of immigration laws are unacco...
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
Unaccompanied minors arriving to the United States fleeing violence and seeking protection are appre...
In Elkins v. Superior Court, 163 P.3d 160 (Cal. 2007), California’s Supreme Court asked the Judicial...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
Children rights advocates and scholars alike continue to call for the development of innovative and ...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
In the case of Reno v. Flores, the United States Supreme Court held that the indefinite detention of...
In 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that when the federal government detains an unacco...
United States citizens, who are children of aliens residing unlawfully in the country, are routinely...
This article analyses United States (US) federal court jurisprudence to determine the legal rights o...
This work addresses the need for parallel due process rights for children by investigating the natur...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
Concepts that are useful in other areas of human rights break down in the context of children. Becau...
Approximately seventy percent of the juveniles arrested for violation of immigration laws are unacco...
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
Unaccompanied minors arriving to the United States fleeing violence and seeking protection are appre...
In Elkins v. Superior Court, 163 P.3d 160 (Cal. 2007), California’s Supreme Court asked the Judicial...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
Children rights advocates and scholars alike continue to call for the development of innovative and ...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...