Since 1954, there has been a prohibition on certain forms of intervention in political campaigns by entities exempt from taxation under section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code—including most. churches. This Article provides a historical perspective on the genesis of this prohibition—the 1954 U.S. Senate campaign of its sponsor, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and the involvement of religious entities and other 501 (c) (3) organizations in his political campaign. Although Johnson was not opposed to using churches to advance his own political interests, lie (lid seek to prevent ideological, tax-exempt organizations from funding McCarthyite candidates including his opponent in the Democratic primary, Dudley Dougherty. The illumination of these ...
Churches and other Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations can lose t...
The government exempts religious associations front taxation and, in return, restricts their putativ...
Churches often bear the burden of the Internal Revenue Code\u27s electioneering prohibition without ...
Since 1954, there has been a prohibition on certain forms of intervention in political campaigns by ...
Each Presidential election renews the thorny debate over the appropriate role of churches and other ...
This Article explores some of the policy justifications offered in support of restricting the politi...
In the years following the 2004 presidential election, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Inter...
This Article is enough to ruin many Thanksgiving family dinners. It is about American religion, poli...
This paper focuses on the rules and requirements governing the participation of religious organizati...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
This Article proposes a unique resolution to the debate over political campaign participation by tax...
This article is about the United States federal tax code and churches. In particular, it discusses t...
More than fifty years ago, Congress enacted a prohibition against political campaign intervention fo...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
Nonprofit section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating or intervening in an ele...
Churches and other Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations can lose t...
The government exempts religious associations front taxation and, in return, restricts their putativ...
Churches often bear the burden of the Internal Revenue Code\u27s electioneering prohibition without ...
Since 1954, there has been a prohibition on certain forms of intervention in political campaigns by ...
Each Presidential election renews the thorny debate over the appropriate role of churches and other ...
This Article explores some of the policy justifications offered in support of restricting the politi...
In the years following the 2004 presidential election, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Inter...
This Article is enough to ruin many Thanksgiving family dinners. It is about American religion, poli...
This paper focuses on the rules and requirements governing the participation of religious organizati...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
This Article proposes a unique resolution to the debate over political campaign participation by tax...
This article is about the United States federal tax code and churches. In particular, it discusses t...
More than fifty years ago, Congress enacted a prohibition against political campaign intervention fo...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
Nonprofit section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating or intervening in an ele...
Churches and other Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations can lose t...
The government exempts religious associations front taxation and, in return, restricts their putativ...
Churches often bear the burden of the Internal Revenue Code\u27s electioneering prohibition without ...