Since 1954, there has been a prohibition on certain forms of intervention in political campaigns by entities exempt from taxation under section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code—including most. churches. This Article provides a historical perspective on the genesis of this prohibition—the 1954 U.S. Senate campaign of its sponsor, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and the involvement of religious entities and other 501 (c) (3) organizations in his political campaign. Although Johnson was not opposed to using churches to advance his own political interests, lie (lid seek to prevent ideological, tax-exempt organizations from funding McCarthyite candidates including his opponent in the Democratic primary, Dudley Dougherty. The illumination of these ...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits charities from intervening in a political c...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission makes a Supreme Court...
Since 1954, there has been a prohibition on certain forms of intervention in political campaigns by ...
Each Presidential election renews the thorny debate over the appropriate role of churches and other ...
In the years following the 2004 presidential election, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Inter...
Nonprofit section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating or intervening in an ele...
This Article proposes a unique resolution to the debate over political campaign participation by tax...
This Article explores some of the policy justifications offered in support of restricting the politi...
President Trump, reiterating the position he took during the presidential campaign, has recently rea...
In 1954, Congress prohibited tax-exempt public charities, including churches, from endorsing or oppo...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
More than fifty years ago, Congress enacted a prohibition against political campaign intervention fo...
Churches and other Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations can lose t...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits charities from intervening in a political c...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission makes a Supreme Court...
Since 1954, there has been a prohibition on certain forms of intervention in political campaigns by ...
Each Presidential election renews the thorny debate over the appropriate role of churches and other ...
In the years following the 2004 presidential election, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Inter...
Nonprofit section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating or intervening in an ele...
This Article proposes a unique resolution to the debate over political campaign participation by tax...
This Article explores some of the policy justifications offered in support of restricting the politi...
President Trump, reiterating the position he took during the presidential campaign, has recently rea...
In 1954, Congress prohibited tax-exempt public charities, including churches, from endorsing or oppo...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
More than fifty years ago, Congress enacted a prohibition against political campaign intervention fo...
Churches and other Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations can lose t...
The restriction on church participation in political campaigns contained in the Internal Revenue Cod...
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits charities from intervening in a political c...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission makes a Supreme Court...