Dear I.R.S., It Is Time to Enforce the Campaigning Prohibition. Even Against Churches

In 1954, Congress prohibited tax-exempt public charities, including churches, from endorsing or opposing candidates for office. To the extent a tax-exempt public charity violated this prohibition, it would no longer qualify as tax-exempt, and the IRS was to revoke its exemption. While simple in theory, in practice, the IRS rarely penalizes churches that violate the campaigning prohibition and virtually never revokes a church\u27s tax exemption. And, because no taxpayer has standing to challenge the IRS\u27s inaction, the IRS has no external imperative to revoke the exemptions of churches that do campaign on behalf of or against candidates for office. This Article makes the normative case that, notwithstanding the IRS\u27s administrative discretion and the inability of taxpayers to challenge its nonenforcement in court, the time has come for the IRS to begin enforcing the campaigning prohibition. Failing to do so harms the rule of law, the taxpaying public, and churches themselves. Moreover, the moment is correct for enforcement, as the difficulty and cost of finding violations has fallen dramatically over the last several years. People are more aware than ever that churches are violating the prohibition, and, in the aftermath of the Supreme Court\u27s Citizens United decision, the campaigning prohibition may represent the final regulatory barrier between charities and politicking