Add to ORKGThis report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, who say that the recent country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture is unfair and does not meet its original objectives. This dispute was brought before the WTO dispute panel and found to be valid. The report ends with a discussion of options for the U.S. in regards to modifying COOL to follow WTO rulings
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
This paper examines the World Trade Organization’s Article 22.6 arbitration report on the dispute ov...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...
This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, who say that t...
This report covers the country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department o...
COOL, WTO, labelling, despite, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade,
Canada and Mexico are formally challenging US country of origin (COOL) legislation at the World Trad...
The COOL (Country of Origing Labelling) measure is a US internal measure, as opposed to a customs or...
In recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of o...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for meat products have been a debated subject since its implementa...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Country of origin labeling (COOL) is a common practice. It occurs routinely for many products in man...
In December 2015 the US Congress repealed the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) requiremen...
This paper examines the Article 22.6 arbitration report of the WTO dispute over the United States’ c...
Abstract In the international scene, country-of-origin labelling (COOL) is a controversial issue. We...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
This paper examines the World Trade Organization’s Article 22.6 arbitration report on the dispute ov...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...
This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, who say that t...
This report covers the country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department o...
COOL, WTO, labelling, despite, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade,
Canada and Mexico are formally challenging US country of origin (COOL) legislation at the World Trad...
The COOL (Country of Origing Labelling) measure is a US internal measure, as opposed to a customs or...
In recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of o...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for meat products have been a debated subject since its implementa...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Country of origin labeling (COOL) is a common practice. It occurs routinely for many products in man...
In December 2015 the US Congress repealed the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) requiremen...
This paper examines the Article 22.6 arbitration report of the WTO dispute over the United States’ c...
Abstract In the international scene, country-of-origin labelling (COOL) is a controversial issue. We...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
This paper examines the World Trade Organization’s Article 22.6 arbitration report on the dispute ov...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...