In December 2015 the US Congress repealed the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) requirement for some agricultural commodities to avoid potential retaliatory tariffs from Canada and Mexico that were authorized by the WTO. In this analysis we simulate and compare the potential welfare effects that such tariffs could have had on two sectors that were likely to be affected by them (dairy and beef) vis-à-vis a scenario where COOL was maintained, using a modified Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model and a sector specific- disaggregated database
Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) regulation has been applied in the United States meat sector sinc...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) is a component of the 2002 US Farm Bill. The provision requires t...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
A provision of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 requires country of origin labeling (C...
Country of origin labeling (COOL) is a common practice. It occurs routinely for many products in man...
In recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of o...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for meat products have been a debated subject since its implementa...
An equilibrium displacement model is developed and used to estimate the welfare impacts of governmen...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (MCOOL) is a labeling law passed in 2008 Farm Bill by the US Co...
This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors Canada and Mexico, who say that th...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...
Concerns about the negative effects of U.S. meat and livestock imports on domestic livestock prices ...
Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) regulation has been applied in the United States meat sector sinc...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) is a component of the 2002 US Farm Bill. The provision requires t...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...
A provision of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 requires country of origin labeling (C...
Country of origin labeling (COOL) is a common practice. It occurs routinely for many products in man...
In recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of o...
The study develops a Muth-type equilibrium displacement model that is able to estimate impacts of CO...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for meat products have been a debated subject since its implementa...
An equilibrium displacement model is developed and used to estimate the welfare impacts of governmen...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (MCOOL) is a labeling law passed in 2008 Farm Bill by the US Co...
This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors Canada and Mexico, who say that th...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...
Concerns about the negative effects of U.S. meat and livestock imports on domestic livestock prices ...
Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) regulation has been applied in the United States meat sector sinc...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) is a component of the 2002 US Farm Bill. The provision requires t...
The much anticipated and hotly debated Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) provision of the 2002 Farm ...