We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of scale in applications programs created a barrier to entry for new operating system competitors, which the combination of Netscape Navigator and the Java programming language potentially could have lowered. Microsoft took actions to eliminate this threat to its operating system monopoly, and some of Microsoft's conduct very likely harmed consumers. While we recognize the risks of the government's proposed structural remedy of splitting Microsoft in two, we are pessimistic that a limited conduct remedy would be effective in this case.
This paper analyzes the central antitrust and economic issues raised by network industries. Network ...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...
We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of ...
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
The purpose of this paper is to clarify what Microsoft did wrong that warranted the antitrust case b...
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear to have concluded. In a unanimous ...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
Thirty years ago, Microsoft Corp. was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. To understand how the c...
Microsoft Corporation, the largest company in the US software industry, has been under anti-trust sc...
Economic Aspects of the Microsoft Case: Networks, Interoperability and Competitio
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
This paper analyzes the central antitrust and economic issues raised by network industries. Network ...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...
We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of ...
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
The purpose of this paper is to clarify what Microsoft did wrong that warranted the antitrust case b...
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear to have concluded. In a unanimous ...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
Thirty years ago, Microsoft Corp. was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. To understand how the c...
Microsoft Corporation, the largest company in the US software industry, has been under anti-trust sc...
Economic Aspects of the Microsoft Case: Networks, Interoperability and Competitio
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
This paper analyzes the central antitrust and economic issues raised by network industries. Network ...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...