Thirty years ago, Microsoft Corp. was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. To understand how the company has gained competitive advantage we examine how the company used unfair, anti-competitive, and predatory approaches in their business. We discuss how we have come to the belief that the government settlement in United States and State of New York, et al., v. Microsoft Corporation imposing restrictions on Microsoft’s behavior and monitoring its actions for compliance is not enough to keep it from abusing its monopolistic power and does too little to prevent it from dominating the software and operating system industry today
[Excerpt] Microsoft Corporation, the world’s largest software company, has been facing antitrust sc...
On June 28, 2001, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws repe...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
The antitrust cases against Microsoft in the United States and Europe have been the most high profil...
As the final judgment in the celebrated Microsoft case ends, this piece very briefly assesses the im...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...
The purpose of this paper is to clarify what Microsoft did wrong that warranted the antitrust case b...
Microsoft Corporation\u27s jousting with the Justice Department\u27s Antitrust Division over the las...
Microsoft has formally complained to the European Commission (EC) about its rival Google’s monopolis...
[Excerpt] Microsoft Corporation, the world’s largest software company, has been facing antitrust sc...
On June 28, 2001, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws repe...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
The antitrust cases against Microsoft in the United States and Europe have been the most high profil...
As the final judgment in the celebrated Microsoft case ends, this piece very briefly assesses the im...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...
The purpose of this paper is to clarify what Microsoft did wrong that warranted the antitrust case b...
Microsoft Corporation\u27s jousting with the Justice Department\u27s Antitrust Division over the las...
Microsoft has formally complained to the European Commission (EC) about its rival Google’s monopolis...
[Excerpt] Microsoft Corporation, the world’s largest software company, has been facing antitrust sc...
On June 28, 2001, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws repe...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....