Review of the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Oliver Earle and others, in equity, versus William Wood and others. To which is added, the substance of the argument prepared by one of the counsel for the defendants [Zachariah Eddy].

Arguments of counsel and judge's charge on the trial of the feigned issue as to the validity of the will of John Mason, deceased, in the case of Joseph Alston, and wife, against Isaac Jones, and others, at a circuit court held in the city of New York, before Hon. James J. Roosevelt, one of the justices of the Supreme Court.

Jones, Isaac, defendant.
Alston, Joseph, plaintiff.
United States. Circuit Court. New York (State)

January 1853

"Reported by Michael Brenan, verbatim reporter"--T.p.Spine title: Arguments in the case of Joseph Al...

M. Wormser, et al., plantiffs, vs. The Salt river valley canal company, et al., defendants ... : Opinion of the court.

United States. District court. Arizona territory. (Third district).
Salt river valley canal company.

January 1892

"A suit instituted for the purpose of enjoining certain parties to it from the diversion of water fr...

Hetty H. Robinson, in equity, vs. Thomas Mandell, et al. : arguments of Hon. T. D. Eliot, and T. M. Stetson, esq. for respondents /

Eliot, Thomas D. (Thomas Dawes), 1808-1870.
Stetson, Thomas M.
Green, Hetty Howland Robinson, 1834-1916.
Mandell, Thomas, respondent.

January 1867

Bound with Robinson, Hetty H. v. Mandell, Thomas, et al. U.S. Circuit Court, etc. Abstract of Pleadi...

Supreme Court, Massachusetts. Earle and others, plaintiffs, against Wood and others, respondents.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.

January 1852

The lawsuit arose out of a separation in the New England Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends.Mo...

Opinions of the justices of the Supreme Judicial Court of New Hampshire, in Hale v. Everett, (the Unitarian church case.) : official report /

New Hampshire. Supreme Judicial Court.

January 1874

p. 276-280 are a portion of another case, Eastman v. Clark.Mode of access: Internet

Report of the case of Earle et al. vs. Wood et al. argued and determined in the Supreme Judicial Court for the counties of Bristol, Plymouth, Barnstable and Dukes County, October term, 1851, at Plymouth.

Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court.
Earle, Oliver, plaintiff.
Wood, William, Quaker, defendant.

January 1855

From Massachusetts reports. Cases argued and determined. Vol. VIII.Mode of access: Internet

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

New Jersey. Court of Chancery.
Field, Charles, defendant.
Field, James, plaintiff.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.

January 1833

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

Case of Catharine N. Forest, plaintiff, against Edwin Forrest, defendant, containing the record in the Superior court of the city of New York, the opinions in that court, the statement and points for each party in the Court of appeals and the judgment of the latter court ...

Forrest, Edwin, 1806-1872.
Forrest, Catherine Norton Sinclair, 1817-1891.
New York (State). Court of Appeals.
New York (State). Superior Court (New York)

January 1863

Vol. 1: [2], viii, 728 p.; v.2: [2], 729-1415 p.Action for divorce.Mode of access: Internet

Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

Southard, Samuel L. (Samuel Lewis), 1787-1842.
Hopper, Edward.
Shotwell, Thomas L., respondent.
Hendrickson, Joseph, appellant.
Decow, Stacy, appellant.

January 1834

On appeal from the Court of Chancery. Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, wh...

A review of the Webster case.

Hall, A. Oakey (Abraham Oakey), 1826-1898.

January 1850

John W. Webster was tried in the Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts, March 19-April 1, 1850, fo...

The Society of Friends vindicated: being the arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a cause decided in the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Shotwell, Thomas L., plaintiff.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.
Williamson, Isaac H. (Isaac Halsted), 1767-1844, joint author.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.

January 1832

Published 1833 under title: The arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson.Dispute concerning a ...

James Cheever and William T. Hart, trustees, et al., vs The Rutland and Burlington Co. et al. : opinion of the court, delivered at Rutland, Feb. 7, 1870 /

Cheever, James.
Rutland and Burlington Railroad Company.

January 1870

At head of title: Supreme court of Vermont, general term, November, 1869.Mode of access: Internet

Case of the slave-child, Med : report of the arguments of counsel, and of the opinion of the court, in the case of Commonwealth vs. Aves; tried and determined in the Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts.

Aves, Thomas, defendant.

January 1836

Med's case.--Arguments of counsel; Benjamin R. Curtis. esq., for the respondent, Ellis Gray Loring, ...

Ross Winans vs. the Eastern Railroad Company. Evidence for complainant. October term, 1853. Counsel. R. Choate, G.T. Curtis, C.M. Keller, C.P. Curtis, Jr., C.G. Loring, S. Bartlett, W. Whiting.

Winans, Ross.
Eastern Railroad Company.

January 1854

At head of title: Circuit Court of the United States. Massachusetts district. In equity.Mode of acce...

Massachusetts digest; a digest of the reported decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from 1804 to 1879, with references to earlier cases,

Bennett, Edmund Hatch, 1824-1898.
Wellman, Francis Lewis, 1854-1942.
Heard, Franklin Fiske, 1825-1889.
Swift, Henry Walton, 1849- joint author.
Gray, Russell, 1850- joint author.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court.

January 1881

"This digest is based on that by Hon. Edmund H. Bennett and Franklin F. Heard, esq. published in 186...

Arguments of counsel and judge's charge on the trial of the feigned issue as to the validity of the will of John Mason, deceased, in the case of Joseph Alston, and wife, against Isaac Jones, and others, at a circuit court held in the city of New York, before Hon. James J. Roosevelt, one of the justices of the Supreme Court.

Jones, Isaac, defendant.
Alston, Joseph, plaintiff.
United States. Circuit Court. New York (State)

January 1853

"Reported by Michael Brenan, verbatim reporter"--T.p.Spine title: Arguments in the case of Joseph Al...

M. Wormser, et al., plantiffs, vs. The Salt river valley canal company, et al., defendants ... : Opinion of the court.

United States. District court. Arizona territory. (Third district).
Salt river valley canal company.

January 1892

"A suit instituted for the purpose of enjoining certain parties to it from the diversion of water fr...

Hetty H. Robinson, in equity, vs. Thomas Mandell, et al. : arguments of Hon. T. D. Eliot, and T. M. Stetson, esq. for respondents /

Eliot, Thomas D. (Thomas Dawes), 1808-1870.
Stetson, Thomas M.
Green, Hetty Howland Robinson, 1834-1916.
Mandell, Thomas, respondent.

January 1867

Bound with Robinson, Hetty H. v. Mandell, Thomas, et al. U.S. Circuit Court, etc. Abstract of Pleadi...

Supreme Court, Massachusetts. Earle and others, plaintiffs, against Wood and others, respondents.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.

January 1852

The lawsuit arose out of a separation in the New England Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends.Mo...

Opinions of the justices of the Supreme Judicial Court of New Hampshire, in Hale v. Everett, (the Unitarian church case.) : official report /

New Hampshire. Supreme Judicial Court.

January 1874

p. 276-280 are a portion of another case, Eastman v. Clark.Mode of access: Internet

Report of the case of Earle et al. vs. Wood et al. argued and determined in the Supreme Judicial Court for the counties of Bristol, Plymouth, Barnstable and Dukes County, October term, 1851, at Plymouth.

Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court.
Earle, Oliver, plaintiff.
Wood, William, Quaker, defendant.

January 1855

From Massachusetts reports. Cases argued and determined. Vol. VIII.Mode of access: Internet

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

New Jersey. Court of Chancery.
Field, Charles, defendant.
Field, James, plaintiff.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.

January 1833

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

Case of Catharine N. Forest, plaintiff, against Edwin Forrest, defendant, containing the record in the Superior court of the city of New York, the opinions in that court, the statement and points for each party in the Court of appeals and the judgment of the latter court ...

Forrest, Edwin, 1806-1872.
Forrest, Catherine Norton Sinclair, 1817-1891.
New York (State). Court of Appeals.
New York (State). Superior Court (New York)

January 1863

Vol. 1: [2], viii, 728 p.; v.2: [2], 729-1415 p.Action for divorce.Mode of access: Internet

Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

Southard, Samuel L. (Samuel Lewis), 1787-1842.
Hopper, Edward.
Shotwell, Thomas L., respondent.
Hendrickson, Joseph, appellant.
Decow, Stacy, appellant.

January 1834

On appeal from the Court of Chancery. Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, wh...

A review of the Webster case.

Hall, A. Oakey (Abraham Oakey), 1826-1898.

January 1850

John W. Webster was tried in the Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts, March 19-April 1, 1850, fo...

The Society of Friends vindicated: being the arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a cause decided in the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Shotwell, Thomas L., plaintiff.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.
Williamson, Isaac H. (Isaac Halsted), 1767-1844, joint author.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.

January 1832

Published 1833 under title: The arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson.Dispute concerning a ...

James Cheever and William T. Hart, trustees, et al., vs The Rutland and Burlington Co. et al. : opinion of the court, delivered at Rutland, Feb. 7, 1870 /

Cheever, James.
Rutland and Burlington Railroad Company.

January 1870

At head of title: Supreme court of Vermont, general term, November, 1869.Mode of access: Internet

Case of the slave-child, Med : report of the arguments of counsel, and of the opinion of the court, in the case of Commonwealth vs. Aves; tried and determined in the Supreme judicial court of Massachusetts.

Aves, Thomas, defendant.

January 1836

Med's case.--Arguments of counsel; Benjamin R. Curtis. esq., for the respondent, Ellis Gray Loring, ...

Ross Winans vs. the Eastern Railroad Company. Evidence for complainant. October term, 1853. Counsel. R. Choate, G.T. Curtis, C.M. Keller, C.P. Curtis, Jr., C.G. Loring, S. Bartlett, W. Whiting.

Winans, Ross.
Eastern Railroad Company.

January 1854

At head of title: Circuit Court of the United States. Massachusetts district. In equity.Mode of acce...

Massachusetts digest; a digest of the reported decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from 1804 to 1879, with references to earlier cases,

Bennett, Edmund Hatch, 1824-1898.
Wellman, Francis Lewis, 1854-1942.
Heard, Franklin Fiske, 1825-1889.
Swift, Henry Walton, 1849- joint author.
Gray, Russell, 1850- joint author.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court.

January 1881

"This digest is based on that by Hon. Edmund H. Bennett and Franklin F. Heard, esq. published in 186...

Arguments of counsel and judge's charge on the trial of the feigned issue as to the validity of the will of John Mason, deceased, in the case of Joseph Alston, and wife, against Isaac Jones, and others, at a circuit court held in the city of New York, before Hon. James J. Roosevelt, one of the justices of the Supreme Court.

Jones, Isaac, defendant.
Alston, Joseph, plaintiff.
United States. Circuit Court. New York (State)

January 1853

"Reported by Michael Brenan, verbatim reporter"--T.p.Spine title: Arguments in the case of Joseph Al...

M. Wormser, et al., plantiffs, vs. The Salt river valley canal company, et al., defendants ... : Opinion of the court.

United States. District court. Arizona territory. (Third district).
Salt river valley canal company.

January 1892

"A suit instituted for the purpose of enjoining certain parties to it from the diversion of water fr...

Hetty H. Robinson, in equity, vs. Thomas Mandell, et al. : arguments of Hon. T. D. Eliot, and T. M. Stetson, esq. for respondents /

Eliot, Thomas D. (Thomas Dawes), 1808-1870.
Stetson, Thomas M.
Green, Hetty Howland Robinson, 1834-1916.
Mandell, Thomas, respondent.

January 1867

Bound with Robinson, Hetty H. v. Mandell, Thomas, et al. U.S. Circuit Court, etc. Abstract of Pleadi...

Review of the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Oliver Earle and others, in equity, versus William Wood and others. To which is added, the substance of the argument prepared by one of the counsel for the defendants [Zachariah Eddy].

Abstract

Extracted data

Review of the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Oliver Earle and others, in equity, versus William Wood and others. To which is added, the substance of the argument prepared by one of the counsel for the defendants [Zachariah Eddy].

Abstract

Extracted data

Topics

Related items

Related items

Topics