Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

Folkestone ritual case : the substance of the argument delivered before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council by Archibald John Stephens on behalf of the respondents, in Ridsdale v. Clifton and others, on the 27th, 29th, and 30th January, 1877.

Stephens, Archibald John, 1808-1880.
Clifton, William.
Stephens, Archibald John, 1808-1880, autograph.
Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee.

January 1877

"Reprinted from a publication intituled Folkstone ritual case", London, 1877.Mode of access: Interne...

William Wiswell, vs. William A. Greene, et al. on reservation from the Distrinct court of Hamilton County, Ohio : argument in behalf of the Church of the Redeemer in reply to the argument of Messrs. Corwine and Pugh /

Whitman, H. C.

January 1862

Concerning the division of property between the two sections of the First Congregational Church of C...

Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad v. State of New Hampshire. Plaintiff's additional argument on questions 5 and 6.

Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad Company, plaintiff.
New Hampshire, respondent.

At head of title: Supreme court. Coös County. Law term, June, 1880.Mode of access: Internet

The Society of Friends vindicated: being the arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a cause decided in the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Shotwell, Thomas L., plaintiff.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.
Williamson, Isaac H. (Isaac Halsted), 1767-1844, joint author.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.

January 1832

Published 1833 under title: The arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson.Dispute concerning a ...

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

New Jersey. Court of Chancery.
Field, Charles, defendant.
Field, James, plaintiff.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.

January 1833

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

A full report of the case of Stacy Decow, and Joseph Hendrickson, vs. Thomas L. Shotwell /

Decow, Stacy, appellant.
Shotwell, Thomas L. rsp
Hendrickson, Joseph, appellant.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.
New Jersey. Court of Appeals.

January 1834

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

An authentic report of the testimony in a cause at issue in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants : taken pursuant to the rules of the court /

Shotwell, Thomas L.
Foster, Jeremiah J.
Decow, Stacy.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.

January 1831

"Foster's report"--Spine.Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claim...

The Society of Friends Vindicated: Being the Arguments of the Counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a Case Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, Complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, Defendants

Wood, George

January 1832

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

The Society of Friends Vindicated: Being the Arguments of the Counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a Case Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, Complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, Defendants

Wood, George

January 1832

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

The Society of Friends Vindicated: Being the Arguments of the Counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a Case Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, Complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, Defendants

Wood, George

January 1832

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

Supreme Court, Massachusetts. Earle and others, plaintiffs, against Wood and others, respondents.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.

January 1852

The lawsuit arose out of a separation in the New England Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends.Mo...

Review of the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Oliver Earle and others, in equity, versus William Wood and others. To which is added, the substance of the argument prepared by one of the counsel for the defendants [Zachariah Eddy].

New England Yearly Meeting of Friends (Conservative : 1845-1945)
Eddy, Zachariah.

January 1855

The lawsuit arose out of a separation in the New England Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends.Mo...

The Parish will case : argument of John K. Porter, in behalf of the respondents, in the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, January 10, 1862.

Porter, John K. (John Kilham), 1819-1892.
Delafield, Joseph, 1790-1875.
Parish, Susan M. (Susan Maria), 1805-1861.
Delafield, Henry, 1792-1875.
Parish, Daniel, of New York.
New York (State). Court of Appeals.

January 1862

Controversy touching the validity of codicils to the will of Henry Parish. Case of Henry Delafield, ...

The right of the people to establish forms of government: Mr. Hallett's argument in the Rhode Island causes, before the Supreme Court of the United States, January 1848 ...

Hallett, Benjamin Franklin, 1797-1862.

January 1848

"No. 14. Martin Luther vs. Luther M. Borden and others. No. 77. Rachel Luther vs. the same."Mode of ...

Arguments of the defendants' counsel, and judgment of the Supreme court, U.S. in the case of Vidal and another, complainants and appellants, versus the mayor, &c. of Philadelphia, the executors of S. Girard, and others, defendants & appellees. January term, 1844. To which is added the will of Stephen Girard.

Binney, Horace, 1780-1875.
Sergeant, John, 1779-1852.
Vidal, Françoise Fénelon. complainant-appellant,
Girard, Stephen, 1750-1831.
Girard College.
Philadelphia (Pa.). Councils, defendant.
United States. Supreme Court.

January 1844

Argument of Horace Binney, esq. for defendents, -- Argument of John Sergeant, esq. -- Opinion, Supre...

Folkestone ritual case : the substance of the argument delivered before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council by Archibald John Stephens on behalf of the respondents, in Ridsdale v. Clifton and others, on the 27th, 29th, and 30th January, 1877.

Stephens, Archibald John, 1808-1880.
Clifton, William.
Stephens, Archibald John, 1808-1880, autograph.
Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee.

January 1877

"Reprinted from a publication intituled Folkstone ritual case", London, 1877.Mode of access: Interne...

William Wiswell, vs. William A. Greene, et al. on reservation from the Distrinct court of Hamilton County, Ohio : argument in behalf of the Church of the Redeemer in reply to the argument of Messrs. Corwine and Pugh /

Whitman, H. C.

January 1862

Concerning the division of property between the two sections of the First Congregational Church of C...

Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad v. State of New Hampshire. Plaintiff's additional argument on questions 5 and 6.

Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad Company, plaintiff.
New Hampshire, respondent.

At head of title: Supreme court. Coös County. Law term, June, 1880.Mode of access: Internet

The Society of Friends vindicated: being the arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a cause decided in the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Shotwell, Thomas L., plaintiff.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.
Williamson, Isaac H. (Isaac Halsted), 1767-1844, joint author.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.

January 1832

Published 1833 under title: The arguments of the counsel of Joseph Hendrickson.Dispute concerning a ...

Decision of the Court of chancery of the state of New Jersey, in a cause between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants. Also the opinion of the Supreme court of the state of New York, in a cause in which James Field was plaintiff, and Charles Field, defendant.

New Jersey. Court of Chancery.
Field, Charles, defendant.
Field, James, plaintiff.
Decow, Stacy, defendant.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.

January 1833

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

A full report of the case of Stacy Decow, and Joseph Hendrickson, vs. Thomas L. Shotwell /

Decow, Stacy, appellant.
Shotwell, Thomas L. rsp
Hendrickson, Joseph, appellant.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.
New Jersey. Court of Appeals.

January 1834

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

An authentic report of the testimony in a cause at issue in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, defendants : taken pursuant to the rules of the court /

Shotwell, Thomas L.
Foster, Jeremiah J.
Decow, Stacy.
Hendrickson, Joseph, defendant.
New Jersey. Court of Chancery.

January 1831

"Foster's report"--Spine.Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claim...

The Society of Friends Vindicated: Being the Arguments of the Counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a Case Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, Complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, Defendants

Wood, George

January 1832

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

The Society of Friends Vindicated: Being the Arguments of the Counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a Case Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, Complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, Defendants

Wood, George

January 1832

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

The Society of Friends Vindicated: Being the Arguments of the Counsel of Joseph Hendrickson, in a Case Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, between Thomas L. Shotwell, Complainant, and Joseph Hendrickson and Stacy Decow, Defendants

Wood, George

January 1832

Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and H...

Supreme Court, Massachusetts. Earle and others, plaintiffs, against Wood and others, respondents.

Wood, George, 1789-1860.

January 1852

The lawsuit arose out of a separation in the New England Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends.Mo...

Review of the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Oliver Earle and others, in equity, versus William Wood and others. To which is added, the substance of the argument prepared by one of the counsel for the defendants [Zachariah Eddy].

New England Yearly Meeting of Friends (Conservative : 1845-1945)
Eddy, Zachariah.

January 1855

The lawsuit arose out of a separation in the New England Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends.Mo...

The Parish will case : argument of John K. Porter, in behalf of the respondents, in the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, January 10, 1862.

Porter, John K. (John Kilham), 1819-1892.
Delafield, Joseph, 1790-1875.
Parish, Susan M. (Susan Maria), 1805-1861.
Delafield, Henry, 1792-1875.
Parish, Daniel, of New York.
New York (State). Court of Appeals.

January 1862

Controversy touching the validity of codicils to the will of Henry Parish. Case of Henry Delafield, ...

The right of the people to establish forms of government: Mr. Hallett's argument in the Rhode Island causes, before the Supreme Court of the United States, January 1848 ...

Hallett, Benjamin Franklin, 1797-1862.

January 1848

"No. 14. Martin Luther vs. Luther M. Borden and others. No. 77. Rachel Luther vs. the same."Mode of ...

Arguments of the defendants' counsel, and judgment of the Supreme court, U.S. in the case of Vidal and another, complainants and appellants, versus the mayor, &c. of Philadelphia, the executors of S. Girard, and others, defendants & appellees. January term, 1844. To which is added the will of Stephen Girard.

Binney, Horace, 1780-1875.
Sergeant, John, 1779-1852.
Vidal, Françoise Fénelon. complainant-appellant,
Girard, Stephen, 1750-1831.
Girard College.
Philadelphia (Pa.). Councils, defendant.
United States. Supreme Court.

January 1844

Argument of Horace Binney, esq. for defendents, -- Argument of John Sergeant, esq. -- Opinion, Supre...

Folkestone ritual case : the substance of the argument delivered before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council by Archibald John Stephens on behalf of the respondents, in Ridsdale v. Clifton and others, on the 27th, 29th, and 30th January, 1877.

Stephens, Archibald John, 1808-1880.
Clifton, William.
Stephens, Archibald John, 1808-1880, autograph.
Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee.

January 1877

"Reprinted from a publication intituled Folkstone ritual case", London, 1877.Mode of access: Interne...

William Wiswell, vs. William A. Greene, et al. on reservation from the Distrinct court of Hamilton County, Ohio : argument in behalf of the Church of the Redeemer in reply to the argument of Messrs. Corwine and Pugh /

Whitman, H. C.

January 1862

Concerning the division of property between the two sections of the First Congregational Church of C...

Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad v. State of New Hampshire. Plaintiff's additional argument on questions 5 and 6.

Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad Company, plaintiff.
New Hampshire, respondent.

At head of title: Supreme court. Coös County. Law term, June, 1880.Mode of access: Internet

Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

Abstract

Extracted data

Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items