Using the aggregative game approach as developed by Cornes and Hartley (2003, 2007) this paper analyzes the conditions under which matching mechanisms in a public good economy lead to interior matching equilibria in which all agents make strictly positive flat contributions to the public good. In particular we show that the distribution of income among the agents is a crucial determinant for the existence of interior matching equilibria. In addition, we explore which matching mechanisms show Warr neutrality and how the size of the economy affects the possibility of implementing a certain type of Pareto optimal solutions through matching.
© 2016. Certain aggregate externalities, like those due to knowledge and public goods, do not change...
We consider pure exchange economies with finitely many private goods including also non- Samuelsonia...
A competitive market mechanism is a prominent example of a non-binary social choice rule, typically ...
If the equilibrium generated by a matching mechanism is to be the desired Pareto optimal outcome, it...
Matching mechanisms are regarded as an important instrument to bring about Pareto optimal allocation...
Matching mechanisms have been proposed to improve public good provision in voluntary contributions. ...
While conventional agreements on international public goods require bilateral or multilateral cooper...
In our previous paper, "Optimal Allocation of Public Goods...," (1977) we presented a mechanism for ...
In our previous paper, "Optimal Allocation of Public Goods...," (1977) we presented a mechanism for ...
This paper proposes a simple two-stage mechanism to establishnpositive contributions to public goods...
Bergstrom, Blume and Varian (1986) provides an elegant game-theoretic model of an economy with one p...
Experimental and empirical evidence identifies social preferences and proposes competing models of s...
Lindahl equilibria are often seen as an ideal outcome of cooperation in a public-goods economy. But ...
We compare two cooperation mechanisms for consumer/producers of a public good: the Nash Bargaining S...
Voluntary contribution games are a classic social dilemma in which the individually dominant strateg...
© 2016. Certain aggregate externalities, like those due to knowledge and public goods, do not change...
We consider pure exchange economies with finitely many private goods including also non- Samuelsonia...
A competitive market mechanism is a prominent example of a non-binary social choice rule, typically ...
If the equilibrium generated by a matching mechanism is to be the desired Pareto optimal outcome, it...
Matching mechanisms are regarded as an important instrument to bring about Pareto optimal allocation...
Matching mechanisms have been proposed to improve public good provision in voluntary contributions. ...
While conventional agreements on international public goods require bilateral or multilateral cooper...
In our previous paper, "Optimal Allocation of Public Goods...," (1977) we presented a mechanism for ...
In our previous paper, "Optimal Allocation of Public Goods...," (1977) we presented a mechanism for ...
This paper proposes a simple two-stage mechanism to establishnpositive contributions to public goods...
Bergstrom, Blume and Varian (1986) provides an elegant game-theoretic model of an economy with one p...
Experimental and empirical evidence identifies social preferences and proposes competing models of s...
Lindahl equilibria are often seen as an ideal outcome of cooperation in a public-goods economy. But ...
We compare two cooperation mechanisms for consumer/producers of a public good: the Nash Bargaining S...
Voluntary contribution games are a classic social dilemma in which the individually dominant strateg...
© 2016. Certain aggregate externalities, like those due to knowledge and public goods, do not change...
We consider pure exchange economies with finitely many private goods including also non- Samuelsonia...
A competitive market mechanism is a prominent example of a non-binary social choice rule, typically ...