Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion in employment decisions made by private employers. This commentary analyzes Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch, a case before the Supreme Court on the issue of whether a job applicant bears the burden of expressly notifying an employer of a conflict between the applicant’s religious beliefs and the employer’s policies before the employer must offer a reasonable accommodation. This case deals with a Muslim woman who was denied employment at a clothing store because her headdress was deemed to be a violation of the store’s policy on employee attire. The Author argues that the Court should recognize that the underlying congre...
This essay is a contribution to the Northwestern University Law Review\u27s colloquy on the minister...
Should a private, religious university lose its tax-exempt status because it bans interracial dating...
In 2010, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commissio...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion in emplo...
This Note evaluates the effect of the 1972 amendment to the Civil Rights Act, which clarifies that t...
Because the primary purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the elimination of racial discrimina...
This Article addresses the circuit split over whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on an...
Instead of the current approach, which defers to religious organizations, this Comment argues that a...
One of the major thrusts of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed by the 88th Congress of the United ...
For many years, religious organizations have engaged in employment practices of dubious legality und...
The purpose of this article is to argue that the federal courts’ prevailing interpretation of Title ...
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which forbids religious discrimination in employment, raises...
Church authority to practice gender discrimination in employment decisions represents the collision ...
Many employers use dress codes to keep visibly religious employees out of sight. Now, the Supreme Co...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act has for 41 years been the law that governs religious discriminatio...
This essay is a contribution to the Northwestern University Law Review\u27s colloquy on the minister...
Should a private, religious university lose its tax-exempt status because it bans interracial dating...
In 2010, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commissio...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion in emplo...
This Note evaluates the effect of the 1972 amendment to the Civil Rights Act, which clarifies that t...
Because the primary purpose of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the elimination of racial discrimina...
This Article addresses the circuit split over whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on an...
Instead of the current approach, which defers to religious organizations, this Comment argues that a...
One of the major thrusts of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed by the 88th Congress of the United ...
For many years, religious organizations have engaged in employment practices of dubious legality und...
The purpose of this article is to argue that the federal courts’ prevailing interpretation of Title ...
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which forbids religious discrimination in employment, raises...
Church authority to practice gender discrimination in employment decisions represents the collision ...
Many employers use dress codes to keep visibly religious employees out of sight. Now, the Supreme Co...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act has for 41 years been the law that governs religious discriminatio...
This essay is a contribution to the Northwestern University Law Review\u27s colloquy on the minister...
Should a private, religious university lose its tax-exempt status because it bans interracial dating...
In 2010, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commissio...