This Essay argues that empathy does and should play an important, albeit limited role, in a judge’s decision making process. Specifically, empathy is essential for making correct, principled, and unbiased judgments, because empathy is one of the few means we have to understand human motivation. Empathy is a crucial cognitive mechanism that can help compensate for common cognitive bias. As such, empathy, appropriately restricted, should be an accepted and meaningful tool for judges to use in evaluating the sufficiency of complaints, especially as they relate to Iqbal’s plausibility pleading standard
American culture certainly has a word for sadness. In fact, we have several words, depression, dejec...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
As a Supreme Court Justice once wrote, “dispassionate judges” are “mythical beings,” like “Santa Cla...
This Essay argues that empathy does and should play an important, albeit limited role, in a judge’s ...
This short essay addresses the contention that empathy in judging is inconsistent with the rule of l...
This paper addresses President Obama’s standard of “empathy” as a qualification for potential nomine...
President Obama has repeatedly stated that he views a capacity for empathy as an essential attribute...
“Empathy” has negative connotations for many legal theorists, who may conceive of it as subjective, ...
On August 6, 2009, then-Judge, now-Justice, Sonia Sotomayor was confirmed as the nation’s first Lati...
Justice Souter\u27s imminent retirement from the U.S. Supreme Court provides President Obama with hi...
The question of whether judges ought to be empathetic has been hotly debated in recent years. This I...
This article explains what President Barack Obama meant when he called empathy an “essential ingre...
This Article explores the effects of a judge’s prior assumptions, values, and experiences on judicia...
Justice, according to a broad consensus of our greatest twentieth century judges, requires a particu...
The independence of the judiciary is challenged in several ways. One is the populist narrative of th...
American culture certainly has a word for sadness. In fact, we have several words, depression, dejec...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
As a Supreme Court Justice once wrote, “dispassionate judges” are “mythical beings,” like “Santa Cla...
This Essay argues that empathy does and should play an important, albeit limited role, in a judge’s ...
This short essay addresses the contention that empathy in judging is inconsistent with the rule of l...
This paper addresses President Obama’s standard of “empathy” as a qualification for potential nomine...
President Obama has repeatedly stated that he views a capacity for empathy as an essential attribute...
“Empathy” has negative connotations for many legal theorists, who may conceive of it as subjective, ...
On August 6, 2009, then-Judge, now-Justice, Sonia Sotomayor was confirmed as the nation’s first Lati...
Justice Souter\u27s imminent retirement from the U.S. Supreme Court provides President Obama with hi...
The question of whether judges ought to be empathetic has been hotly debated in recent years. This I...
This article explains what President Barack Obama meant when he called empathy an “essential ingre...
This Article explores the effects of a judge’s prior assumptions, values, and experiences on judicia...
Justice, according to a broad consensus of our greatest twentieth century judges, requires a particu...
The independence of the judiciary is challenged in several ways. One is the populist narrative of th...
American culture certainly has a word for sadness. In fact, we have several words, depression, dejec...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
As a Supreme Court Justice once wrote, “dispassionate judges” are “mythical beings,” like “Santa Cla...