Add to ORKGUntil recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of an un-copyrighted work was an open one. However, in Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox, the United States Supreme Court speaks directly on this issue, emphasizing the distinction between copyright and trademark protections and cautioning against misuse or overextension of trademark protections into areas traditionally covered by copyright or patent law. This iBrief assesses the importance of such line drawing and explores the implications of this decision
The United States Supreme Court upheld the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 (CTEA) in Eldred v. ...
In a matter of first impression, the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Blockbu...
On February 19, 2002, the United States Supreme Court (www.supremecourtus.gov) gave an unexpected Va...
Until recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of ...
In Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide...
This Article examines the application of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act to claims of reverse passin...
This Comment will analyze Section 102 of the Copyright Act,the right of publicity in common law and ...
On January 15, 2003, the United States Supreme Court released its much anticipated opinion upholding...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
A series of recent cases implicate the extent to which trademark law can be used to control creative...
Integral to the success of a business is its ability to protect its trademark. When another individu...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
In Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. Justice Scalia colorfully warned against resort ...
In Matal v. Tam and Iancu v. Brunetti, the Supreme Court did something it has never done before – ...
Book Chapter Mark McKenna, Trademark Law\u27s Faux Federalism, in Intellectual Property and the Comm...
The United States Supreme Court upheld the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 (CTEA) in Eldred v. ...
In a matter of first impression, the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Blockbu...
On February 19, 2002, the United States Supreme Court (www.supremecourtus.gov) gave an unexpected Va...
Until recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of ...
In Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide...
This Article examines the application of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act to claims of reverse passin...
This Comment will analyze Section 102 of the Copyright Act,the right of publicity in common law and ...
On January 15, 2003, the United States Supreme Court released its much anticipated opinion upholding...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
A series of recent cases implicate the extent to which trademark law can be used to control creative...
Integral to the success of a business is its ability to protect its trademark. When another individu...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
In Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. Justice Scalia colorfully warned against resort ...
In Matal v. Tam and Iancu v. Brunetti, the Supreme Court did something it has never done before – ...
Book Chapter Mark McKenna, Trademark Law\u27s Faux Federalism, in Intellectual Property and the Comm...
The United States Supreme Court upheld the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 (CTEA) in Eldred v. ...
In a matter of first impression, the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Blockbu...
On February 19, 2002, the United States Supreme Court (www.supremecourtus.gov) gave an unexpected Va...