Add to ORKGIn a matter of first impression, the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Blockbuster Videos, Inc. v. City of Tempe, considered whether section 1121(b) of the Lanham Act preempts a municipality\u27s authority to require the alteration of a federally registered trademark. Based on the plain language of the statute, the court held that a local entity may not require the alteration of a trademark to enforce a zoning ordinance, though it may prohibit the display of the trademark
This Comment will analyze Section 102 of the Copyright Act,the right of publicity in common law and ...
On June 11, 2012, in University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. New Life Art, Inc., the U.S. Court o...
In Matal v. Tam and Iancu v. Brunetti, the Supreme Court did something it has never done before – ...
In a matter of first impression, the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Blockbu...
Until recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of ...
In 1978, a Nevada Federal District Court permitted the Nevada Real Estate Advisory Commission to reg...
Integral to the success of a business is its ability to protect its trademark. When another individu...
In Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp., the United States Court of App...
In Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth ...
This Article examines the largely unexplored relationship between municipal zoning or signage ordina...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
There are two things that can be learned from this paper. First, the analytical framework developed ...
Book Chapter Mark McKenna, Trademark Law\u27s Faux Federalism, in Intellectual Property and the Comm...
In Kendall-Jackson v. Gallo,l the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that gra...
Many well-known landmarks, like the Empire State Building, are protected as trademarks. This tradema...
This Comment will analyze Section 102 of the Copyright Act,the right of publicity in common law and ...
On June 11, 2012, in University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. New Life Art, Inc., the U.S. Court o...
In Matal v. Tam and Iancu v. Brunetti, the Supreme Court did something it has never done before – ...
In a matter of first impression, the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Blockbu...
Until recently, the question of whether §43 of the Lanham Act prevented the unaccredited copying of ...
In 1978, a Nevada Federal District Court permitted the Nevada Real Estate Advisory Commission to reg...
Integral to the success of a business is its ability to protect its trademark. When another individu...
In Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp., the United States Court of App...
In Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth ...
This Article examines the largely unexplored relationship between municipal zoning or signage ordina...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
There are two things that can be learned from this paper. First, the analytical framework developed ...
Book Chapter Mark McKenna, Trademark Law\u27s Faux Federalism, in Intellectual Property and the Comm...
In Kendall-Jackson v. Gallo,l the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that gra...
Many well-known landmarks, like the Empire State Building, are protected as trademarks. This tradema...
This Comment will analyze Section 102 of the Copyright Act,the right of publicity in common law and ...
On June 11, 2012, in University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. New Life Art, Inc., the U.S. Court o...
In Matal v. Tam and Iancu v. Brunetti, the Supreme Court did something it has never done before – ...