Since their birth during Reconstruction, the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments have been the subject of heated commentary and varying judicial interpretations. During the 1965 term and more recently, in 1968, the Supreme Court, in several landmark decisions, has expansively described the power granted Congress by those provisions to safeguard civil liberties. This comment examines these decisions from the perspective of early judicial interpretation of the amendments and from the theories offered by modern constitutional scholars. In conclusion, the logical results of this almost unrestricted measure of congressional power are examined
America is its Constitution. In a recent string of decisions invalidating federal civil rights legi...
As an originalist matter, what degree of logistical power did the Framers of the Reconstruction Amen...
In enacting the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Congress sought to overcome decades of outright refusal t...
Since their birth during Reconstruction, the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments have be...
Modern doctrine has not been faithful to the text, history, and structure of the Thirteenth, Fourtee...
This Article systematically analyzes the delicate balance of congressional and judicial authority gr...
Professor Robert Kaczorowski argues for an expansive originalist interpretation of Congressional pow...
The basic thesis of this article is that the enforcement clauses of the thirteenth,\u27 fourteenth, ...
In the past five years, the Supreme Court has reduced the scope of Congress\u27s powers under the Fo...
The Supreme Court recently limited Congress’s ability to pass civil rights statutes for the protecti...
A large body of academic scholarship accuses the Rehnquist Court of undoing the Second Reconstructi...
Following the end of the Civil War, the 39th Congress met to consider legislative proposals that wou...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
The meaning and scope of the fourteenth amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 remain among the ...
At the close of the Civil War, the federal government was faced with the serious problem of protecti...
America is its Constitution. In a recent string of decisions invalidating federal civil rights legi...
As an originalist matter, what degree of logistical power did the Framers of the Reconstruction Amen...
In enacting the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Congress sought to overcome decades of outright refusal t...
Since their birth during Reconstruction, the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments have be...
Modern doctrine has not been faithful to the text, history, and structure of the Thirteenth, Fourtee...
This Article systematically analyzes the delicate balance of congressional and judicial authority gr...
Professor Robert Kaczorowski argues for an expansive originalist interpretation of Congressional pow...
The basic thesis of this article is that the enforcement clauses of the thirteenth,\u27 fourteenth, ...
In the past five years, the Supreme Court has reduced the scope of Congress\u27s powers under the Fo...
The Supreme Court recently limited Congress’s ability to pass civil rights statutes for the protecti...
A large body of academic scholarship accuses the Rehnquist Court of undoing the Second Reconstructi...
Following the end of the Civil War, the 39th Congress met to consider legislative proposals that wou...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
The meaning and scope of the fourteenth amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 remain among the ...
At the close of the Civil War, the federal government was faced with the serious problem of protecti...
America is its Constitution. In a recent string of decisions invalidating federal civil rights legi...
As an originalist matter, what degree of logistical power did the Framers of the Reconstruction Amen...
In enacting the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Congress sought to overcome decades of outright refusal t...