In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constitutional amendment that would enable Congress to override judicial review by reenacting a statute. Such an amendment would, of course, run in stark contrast to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This paper explores nature of this proposed amendment and analyzes the implications of overturning the foundation of judicial power in our tripartite system of government. In sum, the author suggests that judicial review serves as an excellent check on Congress and the temporary passions of the public itself
Supreme Court Justices, in their role as interpreters of the Constitution, have often determined pub...
The judicial review owes its popularity primarily to the judgment in the Marbury v. Madison case, wh...
This year marks the 200th anniversary of Marbury v. Madison, the case which is often taught in law s...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
This article examines the controversy the Supreme Court have declaring unconstitutional several acts...
The power of the Supreme Court of the United States to supervise Congressional legislation has been ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This is a remarkably quiet period in the public life of the Constitution. It is not a quiet time for...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
Over the past three decades, the Supreme Court has struck down federal statutes by a bare majority w...
For more than one hundred years, legal scholars have endlessly and heatedly debated whether judicial...
For more than one hundred years, legal scholars have endlessly and heatedly debated whether judicial...
Over the past three decades, the Supreme Court has struck down federal statutes by a bare majority w...
Supreme Court Justices, in their role as interpreters of the Constitution, have often determined pub...
The judicial review owes its popularity primarily to the judgment in the Marbury v. Madison case, wh...
This year marks the 200th anniversary of Marbury v. Madison, the case which is often taught in law s...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
This article examines the controversy the Supreme Court have declaring unconstitutional several acts...
The power of the Supreme Court of the United States to supervise Congressional legislation has been ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This is a remarkably quiet period in the public life of the Constitution. It is not a quiet time for...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
Over the past three decades, the Supreme Court has struck down federal statutes by a bare majority w...
For more than one hundred years, legal scholars have endlessly and heatedly debated whether judicial...
For more than one hundred years, legal scholars have endlessly and heatedly debated whether judicial...
Over the past three decades, the Supreme Court has struck down federal statutes by a bare majority w...
Supreme Court Justices, in their role as interpreters of the Constitution, have often determined pub...
The judicial review owes its popularity primarily to the judgment in the Marbury v. Madison case, wh...
This year marks the 200th anniversary of Marbury v. Madison, the case which is often taught in law s...