In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constitutional amendment that would enable Congress to override judicial review by reenacting a statute. Such an amendment would, of course, run in stark contrast to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This paper explores nature of this proposed amendment and analyzes the implications of overturning the foundation of judicial power in our tripartite system of government. In sum, the author suggests that judicial review serves as an excellent check on Congress and the temporary passions of the public itself
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Many constitutional scholars are obsessed with judicial review and the many questions surrounding it...
The unique and antidemocratic power of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court is not a b...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
This article examines the controversy the Supreme Court have declaring unconstitutional several acts...
The power of the Supreme Court of the United States to supervise Congressional legislation has been ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This is a remarkably quiet period in the public life of the Constitution. It is not a quiet time for...
Over the past three decades, the Supreme Court has struck down federal statutes by a bare majority w...
For more than one hundred years, legal scholars have endlessly and heatedly debated whether judicial...
Supreme Court Justices, in their role as interpreters of the Constitution, have often determined pub...
The judicial review owes its popularity primarily to the judgment in the Marbury v. Madison case, wh...
This year marks the 200th anniversary of Marbury v. Madison, the case which is often taught in law s...
Two hundred years have passed since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Marbury v. Madison, yet debat...
In tracing the establishment of judicial review subsequently to the inauguration of the national gov...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Many constitutional scholars are obsessed with judicial review and the many questions surrounding it...
The unique and antidemocratic power of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court is not a b...
In 1924, Plank Five of the Platform of the Independent candidate for President proposed a constituti...
This article examines the controversy the Supreme Court have declaring unconstitutional several acts...
The power of the Supreme Court of the United States to supervise Congressional legislation has been ...
The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congr...
This is a remarkably quiet period in the public life of the Constitution. It is not a quiet time for...
Over the past three decades, the Supreme Court has struck down federal statutes by a bare majority w...
For more than one hundred years, legal scholars have endlessly and heatedly debated whether judicial...
Supreme Court Justices, in their role as interpreters of the Constitution, have often determined pub...
The judicial review owes its popularity primarily to the judgment in the Marbury v. Madison case, wh...
This year marks the 200th anniversary of Marbury v. Madison, the case which is often taught in law s...
Two hundred years have passed since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Marbury v. Madison, yet debat...
In tracing the establishment of judicial review subsequently to the inauguration of the national gov...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Many constitutional scholars are obsessed with judicial review and the many questions surrounding it...
The unique and antidemocratic power of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court is not a b...