Continuing a study of the first hundred years of constitutional litigation, Professor Currie explores the decisions of the Taney period respecting the Contract and Commerce Clauses. Though early decisions of the Taney Court seemed to portend a departure from the nationalism of its predecessor, the author argues that the impression was largely misleading. In general, for example, the Court under Taney proved rather sympathetic to contract rights. In Commerce Clause cases, after being badly split, the Court was able to agree on a longlasting formula that acknowledged an implicit limitation on state power; and although in the Taney period the Court never clearly struck down a state law on Commerce Clause grounds, it found other ways to protect...
Citation: Emrick, Eugene. History of the Supreme Court. Senior thesis, Kansas State Agricultural Col...
The Dred Scott decision is remembered as arguably the most damaging opinion rendered by the Supreme ...
In the historic case of M\u27Culloch v. Maryland, CHIEF Justice Marshall said, referring to the Fede...
Continuing a study of the first hundred years of constitutional litigation, Professor Currie explore...
Continuing his critical analysis of the constitutional decisions of the Taney period, Professor Curr...
Between 1837 and 1852, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was severly divided over...
This is the latest in Professor Currie\u27s continuing series on the historical development of const...
During the early nineteenth century, the contract clause served as the fundamental source of federal...
In the first of three articles, distinguished political scientist Carl B. Swisher discusses the role...
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
Less than fifteen years ago, there were constitutional problems important enough to stir the country...
In 1818, the United State Supreme Court ended the year's term without rendering a decision in the ca...
In recent years one often hears lawyers say that the Constitution is gone; or one hears them echo t...
Commerce Clause New Federalism in the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts describes how interpretation of t...
The framers of the Constitution designed a document to be the Supreme Law of the Land and within i...
Citation: Emrick, Eugene. History of the Supreme Court. Senior thesis, Kansas State Agricultural Col...
The Dred Scott decision is remembered as arguably the most damaging opinion rendered by the Supreme ...
In the historic case of M\u27Culloch v. Maryland, CHIEF Justice Marshall said, referring to the Fede...
Continuing a study of the first hundred years of constitutional litigation, Professor Currie explore...
Continuing his critical analysis of the constitutional decisions of the Taney period, Professor Curr...
Between 1837 and 1852, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was severly divided over...
This is the latest in Professor Currie\u27s continuing series on the historical development of const...
During the early nineteenth century, the contract clause served as the fundamental source of federal...
In the first of three articles, distinguished political scientist Carl B. Swisher discusses the role...
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
Less than fifteen years ago, there were constitutional problems important enough to stir the country...
In 1818, the United State Supreme Court ended the year's term without rendering a decision in the ca...
In recent years one often hears lawyers say that the Constitution is gone; or one hears them echo t...
Commerce Clause New Federalism in the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts describes how interpretation of t...
The framers of the Constitution designed a document to be the Supreme Law of the Land and within i...
Citation: Emrick, Eugene. History of the Supreme Court. Senior thesis, Kansas State Agricultural Col...
The Dred Scott decision is remembered as arguably the most damaging opinion rendered by the Supreme ...
In the historic case of M\u27Culloch v. Maryland, CHIEF Justice Marshall said, referring to the Fede...