Continuing his critical analysis of the constitutional decisions of the Taney period, Professor Currie examines cases involving the privileges and immunities clause, fugitives from slavery and criminal prosecution, and intergovernmental immunities, as well as cases dealing with the scope of federal judicial and legislative powers. In these decisions, with the glaring exception ofScott v. Sandford, he finds additional evidence that in general the Taney Court continued to enforce constitutional limitations vigorously against the states and to construe federal authority generously
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
In interpreting the Constitution the Supreme Court has increasingly referred to The Federalist paper...
It is repeatedly claimed in high places that the action of the Supreme Court in declaring acts of Co...
Continuing his critical analysis of the constitutional decisions of the Taney period, Professor Curr...
Continuing a study of the first hundred years of constitutional litigation, Professor Currie explore...
This is the latest in Professor Currie\u27s continuing series on the historical development of const...
In the first of three articles, distinguished political scientist Carl B. Swisher discusses the role...
The framers of the Constitution designed a document to be the Supreme Law of the Land and within i...
Between 1837 and 1852, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was severly divided over...
The Supreme Court of Tennessee has been faced with few major Constitutional Law problems during the ...
Although the Constitution vests the Judicial Power of the United States in the Supreme Court and i...
In The FederalistNo. 78, Alexander Hamilton examined the judicial department. He relied on that bran...
This essay is a chapter to be included in the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on the U.S. Constitution. ...
This dissertation examines the Supreme Court's impact on the constitutional development of the feder...
It has become commonplace to describe the Rehnquist Court as having staged a Federalism Revolution....
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
In interpreting the Constitution the Supreme Court has increasingly referred to The Federalist paper...
It is repeatedly claimed in high places that the action of the Supreme Court in declaring acts of Co...
Continuing his critical analysis of the constitutional decisions of the Taney period, Professor Curr...
Continuing a study of the first hundred years of constitutional litigation, Professor Currie explore...
This is the latest in Professor Currie\u27s continuing series on the historical development of const...
In the first of three articles, distinguished political scientist Carl B. Swisher discusses the role...
The framers of the Constitution designed a document to be the Supreme Law of the Land and within i...
Between 1837 and 1852, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was severly divided over...
The Supreme Court of Tennessee has been faced with few major Constitutional Law problems during the ...
Although the Constitution vests the Judicial Power of the United States in the Supreme Court and i...
In The FederalistNo. 78, Alexander Hamilton examined the judicial department. He relied on that bran...
This essay is a chapter to be included in the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on the U.S. Constitution. ...
This dissertation examines the Supreme Court's impact on the constitutional development of the feder...
It has become commonplace to describe the Rehnquist Court as having staged a Federalism Revolution....
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to regulate interstate and fore...
In interpreting the Constitution the Supreme Court has increasingly referred to The Federalist paper...
It is repeatedly claimed in high places that the action of the Supreme Court in declaring acts of Co...